Edit: My apologies. I completely misinterpreted what you wrote. I thought you meant if we switched to a different QB on our roster (not Hurts) we would have won by 35.Quite honestly, the way some of you think, if the equivalent of the Tom Brady of today were currently a frosh at Bama, he simply couldn't see field for the next three years.
Straight talk about Jalen ...
He's a dynamic, talented player who's poise and ability to run put him in the starting spot over a very mediocre field of candidates last year.
That's it. It's as simple as that.
But any objective observer could see that, had we switched QBs with Clemson last year, we would have won that game by a minimum of 35 points. Minimum.
Point being, there is a vast improvement in the QB position possible over what we saw last year.
And that is why, in my book, there is no justification for believing that Hurts has "won" the position in any real sense.
He has to improve on his passing, big league.
We have to be able to be balanced and capable of a downfield threat against top completion this year, or else, we have to conclude that he may not be the answer.
He was a frosh. He did very well for a frosh. But he has not wrapped up that position for the remainder of his career at Bama.
I know. Coach Saban knows it. And Tua knows it.
Last edited: