The chart itself is powerful, but without context.
What would the second-best team's chart look like?
There was a brief touch on several teams whose success didn't collectively add up to Alabama's. But it was a quick picture with no meaningful explanation.
In context, versus the other best teams since 2008, it's domination of the rest of the CFB world in the truest sense of the word.
The case for Alabama is MUCH stronger than the case they made.