yeah, i just changed the subject instead of pointing that out.Unfortunately you are right. And the thing is, if it were their daughter, they wouldn't react that way.
yeah, i just changed the subject instead of pointing that out.Unfortunately you are right. And the thing is, if it were their daughter, they wouldn't react that way.
Who knows, with a God-fearing man such as Roy Moore they may have blessed the union.Unfortunately you are right. And the thing is, if it were their daughter, they wouldn't react that way.
"If I weren't in jail and lived in Alabama, I would have had all my wives and kids vote for Roy Moore. He stands for values we believe in."
"Why don't these women come forward sooner?"
Roy Moore accuser's Gadsden home burns; arson investigation underway
Burns! Just like she's gonna burn in hell for turning on a God fearin' man such as Roy Moore."Why don't these women come forward sooner?"
Roy Moore accuser's Gadsden home burns; arson investigation underway
that's a nice picture.
Says it will end special elections, but not how they will decide who will be the senator in a case where a special election would be needed. I do not buy the saving the state money line though. I think they are trying to control who gets senate seats.
If there is no special election, then the vote would need to be cast at the next general election. The lingering question is whether the state's governor would appoint the interim Senator, and I suspect that would be the plan here (as it is in many other states).Says it will end special elections, but not how they will decide who will be the senator in a case where a special election would be needed. I do not buy the saving the state money line though. I think they are trying to control who gets senate seats.
Given our history of governors, I'm not sure they should appoint a dog walker, let alone a senator.If there is no special election, then the vote would need to be cast at the next general election. The lingering question is whether the state's governor would appoint the interim Senator, and I suspect that would be the plan here (as it is in many other states).
Frankly, it sounds more like sour grapes than a legitimate budget-conscious proposal to save money.
Introducing the Honorable Senator Sidepiece.Given our history of governors, I'm not sure they should appoint a dog walker, let alone a senator.
But it's not.If there is no special election, then the vote would need to be cast at the next general election. The lingering question is whether the state's governor would appoint the interim Senator, and I suspect that would be the plan here (as it is in many other states).
Frankly, it sounds more like sour grapes than a legitimate budget-conscious proposal to save money.
Clouse said he developed the bill in May and filed the first draft in August, before the Democratic and Republican primaries for the seat.
For those that share this thinking, what do you think about members of the judicial branch being appointed by the Governor during a term?I don't have a problem with a special election if the next regular election is a long way off, as this one was. I don't know how you define an appropriate length of time, but if the next general election is more than a year away, then a special election would be warranted.
I do think there should be a provision where whoever is appointed can't run for the seat. That prevents the governor hand-picking someone and giving them a huge advantage. Granted, it didn't work out for Strange, but that was a special circumstance. He still made the runoff and was able to benefit from national support for the incumbent.
I wouldn't mind there being a blanket primary for a special election to cut down on the number of times we go vote. A decent Democrat should still have at least 35-40% support. The guy running against Shelby in 2016 got 36%. So if you have two or more strong candidates running as Republicans, a Democrat would at least be able to make the run-off.