Not necessarily. Anthony Grant would have little to do with AAU BB. It was a complaint by many that he would not play ball, thus he did not recruit as well as many thought he should. If he were still at Bama I would have almost zero apprehension. Avery does play ball with them. Does that mean he or his staff cheats, not necessarily, but it opens up the possibility. I.e., I would not be shocked but a little surprised if Bama was involved. If Mark Gottfried or Wimp were here I would be surprised if Bama was not involved. Btw, I've always felt that CBB was by far the most corrupt sport, one player can change the entire trajectory of a program. But I do believe there are relatively clean programs. I think there is a decent chance Bama is one of them, 3 years ago I would have felt there was a great chance.Of course not, and at the moment neither should anyone else. Every major program should be on pins and needles.
In all fairness he might not consider Alabama a major program, heh.Not necessarily. Anthony Grant would have little to do with AAU BB.
http://scout.com/college/auburn/Boa...ns-NCAA-fraud-hotline-asks-for-tips-108043652reading their boards on this latest fiasco, one doesn't need to look very long to see the hateful bunch known as auburn fans quickly deflect from their doomed athletic shenanigans by pointing out that Alabama football is more corrupt than anything that goes on in their lovely institution of higher learning.
they are predictable as the rising sun.
If we are comparing, there's a bit of a gulf between our programs with y'all obviously being the more consistent and storied of the two.In all fairness he might not consider Alabama a major program, heh.
You're reading ITAT. It would be surprising if they weren't blaming our problems on the REC.http://scout.com/college/auburn/Boa...ns-NCAA-fraud-hotline-asks-for-tips-108043652
right on cue. they never miss an opportunity, do they??
That someone was Michel, the guy with the suit store in Atlanta. Read what the DOJ released. It's all there.I don't think the notion that Pearl was not aware of this situation will fly. Logic tells you that Chuck Person in Auburn ,Alabama is not going to contact a financial advisor in New York out of the blue without someone pointing him his direction. Who at Auburn has a history of signing players from New York? Hmm. There are more questions than answers at this point, but if Auburn really wants to correct things, they need to clean the athletic dept house completely starting with Pat Dye. The culture there for years has been "if you can't prove it, we didn't do it".
I knew Grant didn't play ball with the AAU. Someone mentioned it yesterday in the BB thread.Not necessarily. Anthony Grant would have little to do with AAU BB. It was a complaint by many that he would not play ball, thus he did not recruit as well as many thought he should. If he were still at Bama I would have almost zero apprehension. Avery does play ball with them. Does that mean he or his staff cheats, not necessarily, but it opens up the possibility. I.e., I would not be shocked but a little surprised if Bama was involved. If Mark Gottfried or Wimp were here I would be surprised if Bama was not involved. Btw, I've always felt that CBB was by far the most corrupt sport, one player can change the entire trajectory of a program. But I do believe there are relatively clean programs. I think there is a decent chance Bama is one of them, 3 years ago I would have felt there was a great chance.
So we are to believe that a guy selling suits in Atlanta hooked up with the financial advisor in New York and put the deal together. Chuck person was essentially entrapped and an innocent victim. BTW, AU has already hired Lightfoot, Franklin again. Gee, I wonder how much of our tax dollars go to this firm to defend AU athletics.That someone was Michel, the guy with the suit store in Atlanta. Read what the DOJ released. It's all there.
The interesting thing is the FBI and the NCAA seem to have completely different priorities and approaches.I don't know the details of this so I may be wrong, but this looks to me like a huge failure and embarrassment by the NCAA. Am i wrong?
Yes, you're wrong. Read about how all this came about. The NCAA doesn't have subpoena power and the investigation started with something that the NCAA would never have knowledge of..I don't know the details of this so I may be wrong, but this looks to me like a huge failure and embarrassment by the NCAA. Am i wrong?
Not really - at least not yet. The FBI stumbled upon this when someone they had in their sites started talking in order to reduce his potential jail time. The FBI has two distinct advantage over the NCAA that allow it to find things that otherwise might remain hidden:I don't know the details of this so I may be wrong, but this looks to me like a huge failure and embarrassment by the NCAA. Am i wrong?
If Nike is dirty, I guarantee you KY is. Heck, they have Calipari as their head coach - need I say more?Could both major programs in Kentucky be getting looked at by the FBI? If Nike is being looked at could the flagship Wildcats be next?
Wonder if the FBI takes a trip down Tobacco Road after they play Bluegrass? This could lay waste to the division one basketball landscape potentially.If Nike is dirty, I guarantee you KY is. Heck, they have Calipari as their head coach - need I say more?
The DOJ had an informant relaying this info to them. This was the "financial advisor" in question. Read the report. It's all there.So we are to believe that a guy selling suits in Atlanta hooked up with the financial advisor in New York and put the deal together.
Hardly. They may have given him the rope, but he hung himself with it.Chuck person was essentially entrapped and an innocent victim.
An independent investigation is absolutely necessary in a situation like this.BTW, AU has already hired Lightfoot, Franklin again. Gee, I wonder how much of our tax dollars go to this firm to defend AU athletics.