You're just psychic and didn't know it.I wouldn't trust the Equifax site lookup tool.
I just typed a bunch of completely random names and numbers into the fields. It gave me "potentially impacted" and "not impacted" answers at random.
You're just psychic and didn't know it.I wouldn't trust the Equifax site lookup tool.
I just typed a bunch of completely random names and numbers into the fields. It gave me "potentially impacted" and "not impacted" answers at random.
They could have easily done that anytime if they wanted to.When I first saw Equifax's web page I felt as though I was looking at a big marketing ploy. Now I just don't know. I get the feeling that they are offering something free for a year with an effort to hook the user into being a lifelong customer of the protection service.
Yes and this may be the best, most logical approach to the situation but I wouldn't be shocked if I'm asked to sign up with a credit card for automatic renewal.They could have easily done that anytime if they wanted to.
Well, I thought so. But then:So what is the best option now? Just pay all 3 to do a credit freeze?
As consumers registered and moved to lock their credit reports—in order to prevent anyone who had stolen data from opening credit in their name—they found that the security personal identification number (PIN) provided in the locking process was potentially insecure.
A number of customers discovered that the PINs generated by [freezing your credit] were non-random and apparently sequential—in fact, they were essentially date-time stamps of the time of enrollment. Such PINs could potentially be brute-forced by someone attempting to unlock a credit report for the purpose of identity theft.
https://twitter.com/abc/status/[COLOR=#14171A][FONT="]https://twitter.com/webster/status/906346071210778625[/FONT][/COLOR]Why am I reminded of the gang that couldn't shoot straight?
Equifax’s security failure affected 143 million US consumers, or 44 percent of the US population. To add insult to injury, Equifax waited over a month before revealing the security breach it had suffered. If you’re one of the millions affected by the breach, a chatbot can now help you sue Equifax in small claims court, potentially letting you avoid hiring a lawyer for advice.
Even if you want to be part of the class action lawsuit against Equifax, you can still sue Equifax for negligence in small claims court using the DoNotPay bot and demand maximum damages. Maximum damages range between $2,500 in states like Rhode Island and Kentucky to $25,000 in Tennessee.
YOU STILL HAVE TO SERVE THE LEGAL FORMS YOURSELF
The bot, which launched in all 50 states in July, is mainly known for helping with parking tickets. But with this new update, its creator, Joshua Browder, who was one of the 143 million affected by the breach, is tackling a much bigger target, with larger aspirations to match. He says, “I hope that my product will replace lawyers, and, with enough success, bankrupt Equifax.”
Unless you opt out, you will be added to class actions automatically, if your data is affected...I will join any and every class action suit against Equifax and I'm considering looking into that app Jon posted about if it turns out to be legit. Not because I care about getting money from Equifax but because I truly believe that they need to be buried for this and bankrupted beyond there wildest dreams. Upper management, CEO and even the head IT security guys should face jail time IMO.
I'll be there for my $6 settlement check.Unless you opt out, you will be added to class actions automatically, if your data is affected...
the corner store wont know what hit them when i buy 2 40'sI'll be there for my $6 settlement check.
It's more likely to be in the form of a $6 coupon for Equifax's new credit monitoring service...I'll be there for my $6 settlement check.