No offense, and not trying to argue - I'm just legitimately curious about how you distinguish Two loss aub as "deserving" vs. two loss O$U as "may make it"?
And to be clear, just like everyone else, I hope like heck we get in, regardless of how or why. But I'm curious why you give the nod to aub but not O$U, when the Buckeyes have a pretty strong record of getting in 2/3 of the times so far, despite "questionable" provenance".
Because they got pantsed last time? IF anything, I see that as an argument to keep US out... unfortunately..... That and the prospect of the Committee potentially looking at UGa or aub already in the bracket.
