US Constitution
So these referenda are useful to gauge public sentiment, but they are as constitutionally binding as my horoscope it.Article IV said:...no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress
In the 1855 Virginia gubernatorial election, the vote was 156,629. In the 1859 election (the last before the War to Prevent Southern Independence), the vote had been 148,808. In the 1863 gubernatorial election, the total vote count in the "loyal" gubernatorial election was 3,755, and this was the government that Abraham Lincoln recognized as the legitimate government of Virginia. I don't think even the Trumpster has the stones to do that.If that's the case then it has a chance after all... JS
today's republicans can't even work the phones and light switches in the white house. so i think we're safe.In the 1855 Virginia gubernatorial election, the vote was 156,629. In the 1859 election (the last before the War to Prevent Southern Independence), the vote had been 148,808. In the 1863 gubernatorial election, the total vote count in the "loyal" gubernatorial election was 3,755, and this was the government that Abraham Lincoln recognized as the legitimate government of Virginia. I don't think even the Trumpster has the stones to do that.
Of course, Article IV Section 4 says "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." Lincoln and his cronies used this to declare that elected state governments, even after the war was over, were not "republican" governments and overthrew them on that basis, and appointed military governments in their stead.
Maybe today's Republicans could take a page out of Honest Abe's play book, declare that California does not have a republican form of government and overthrow the state government by military force and pick twenty quislings, declare that they are the state government, and get them to agree to divide California up. After all, if Lincoln did it, it must be okay, right?
Fair enough, but I don't think the Democrats would ever have a problem citing Lincoln's example to do much the same things.today's republicans can't even work the phones and light switches in the white house. so i think we're safe.
that will probably really bother the lincoln was history's greatest monster contingent.Fair enough, but I don't think the Democrats would ever have a problem citing Lincoln's example to do much the same things.
I'll ask colleagues in the "Lincoln was the most overrated president in American history and was not a particularly nice man" contingent if they know anyone in the "lincoln was history's greatest monster" contingent.that will probably really bother the lincoln was history's greatest monster contingent.
be wary, they might think you are a splitterI'll ask colleagues in the "Lincoln was the most overrated president in American history and was not a particularly nice man" contingent if they know anyone in the "lincoln was history's greatest monster" contingent.
Maybe we can clear this up.