Selma's 90's revisited threads have got me thinking of how good Bowden really was. I really have this feeling that Bowden was the Emmitt Smith of college football coaches in that he was above average, but just continued to play until the record was his. I think also Bowden's success really depended on Miami being down, and one of his championships (93) had so many bogus calls. Then his legitimate championship I believe he was gift wrapped VT instead of playing Nebraska, Michigan, and Bama.
I think he was above average, but FSU apologists continue to try to sell me that he has done more with less than CNS, Urban Meyer, and Coach bryant.
I guess its sort of a matter of semantics. I clicked on "above average", but only because I have a VERY lofty standard of what constitutes "Great".
But by almost any metric imaginable, Bobby had an amazing career full of amazing accomplishments - and frankly, I don't think anyone could rationally exclude him from any list of the Top-20 or 30 CFB coaches of all time. And we could probably make several arguments for him being on a Top-10 all time list.
Who knows how many NC's he might have won in the current "P_ayoff" era when even the Fourth "Best" team gets a shot at the title?
Yes, he did "more with less" than some other coaches...... at first. But by the latter 80's he was recruiting "lights out" and pretty much getting his pick of the cream of Southeastern talent. We didn't have all the widely circulated "recruiting ratings" then like we have now, but I suspect that from around '86-88 through 2000-'04-ish he very seldom signed a class outside the top-5 or so.....
So yea, "Great" in a lot of respects - but can we really say he was better than his peers? the leading coaches of the '80's and '90's? Did he really have more success than Barry Switzer, or Jimmy Johnson, or Dennis Erikson, or Tom Osborne? Or did he just stick around longer?