I still go to al dot com each morning for headlines. Yes. Headline. The old newspaper from 15-20 years ago had actually had articles and not just one little paragraph "articles." Now I have learned it is not worth loading an ad just to see a three line "article." So, if the headline does not tell me what I need to know I go to CBS or ESPN or TideFans to get the rest of the story.AL.com changed a few years ago to generate more comment section activity, which smacked of desperation. Some might catch my drift. I don't really read much of anything there anymore.
I never liked Scab or his writing style. Yep, he was a comment chaser (like an ambulance chaser, but more irritating) and never offered much that I cared for. Bye.
Also, thanks for teaching me about bury the lede. I never knew.
All I will say is this trend is one of the biggest frustrations for most journalists that are working in the field. The issue is most papers nationally are owned by cooperations. (and most are not even in the same region as the papers they own) The cooperations focus more on the business side than the public servant side of journalism than they should. They believed technology had a bigger effect on the print product than it actually did so they sold out to commit to the new trend quicker than they actually should have.I still go to al dot com each morning for headlines. Yes. Headline. The old newspaper from 15-20 years ago had actually had articles and not just one little paragraph "articles." Now I have learned it is not worth loading an ad just to see a three line "article." So, if the headline does not tell me what I need to know I go to CBS or ESPN or TideFans to get the rest of the story.
I find it sad that a once valuable newspaper has become an internet "headline" publisher.
Agreed. Journalism had the opportunity to expound more in depth into topics but chose to give less to the reader instead. That like taking 2 ounces out of the Hunt's spaghetti sauce for the same price (or out of the box of cereal). Difference is there are more choices in print/online. Make your product stand out. Make it higher quality. Make it worth the money.All I will say is this trend is one of the biggest frustrations for most journalists that are working in the field. The issue is most papers nationally are owned by cooperations. (and most are not even in the same region as the papers they own) The cooperations focus more on the business side than the public servant side of journalism than they should. They believed technology had a bigger effect on the print product than it actually did so they sold out to commit to the new trend quicker than they actually should have.
Some companies are starting to see the error of focusing more on the business side but its going to take a better effort and commitment to show the people why the print model still works (for now) and why good journalism is always important, especially in this day and age.
OK I'm off my soapbox, back to the topic at hand