From what I read on here last year, it sounded like it dang near caused a mutiny last season when the clearly better QB was kept on the bench. Just IMO.Don't get me wrong when I say this because I completely understand the issues in juggling all of the players during the season - while that is the most likely scenario, it also goes against what Saban preaches about doing things the right way and playing to the standard. In return, it has to send a mixed message to the rest of the team (or at least frustrate the heck out of them).
He was forced into action by the injury of Miller and Barrett ahead of him. Meyer would never have played him without those injuries.Cardale Jones?
Yup, and that's what's puzzling to me about this whole situation - we've all heard Saban preach over and over that every position is up for grabs, no one is assumed to be the starter, and the guy who puts the team in the best position to win will play.But Spurrier replaced his QBs all the time. As a former QB, he was not interested in the ego of his QBs. He wanted someone on the field who could perform. Most head coaches do not change QBs for poor performance once they have won the starting job.
I was exactly in this position after watching CR run routes all season and be missed on the most basic passes. I felt after the Auburn game that the receivers had to be deeply concerned that they had made a wrong decision coming to Alabama.Yup, and that's what's puzzling to me about this whole situation - we've all heard Sbana preach over and over that every position is up for grabs, no one is assumed to be the starter, and the guy who puts the team in the best position to win will play.
No better way to undermine your recruiting prowess than to preach about how everyone competes for playing time then benching the obviously better player. It's not just Bama fans who see this happening.
I don't think there is a football term for openness of that magnitude. The camera is zoomed out and Foster is the only player in the frame. JK could have punted it more accurately.14:45 and Foster is Wide....WIDE OPEN with no one in the Area Code but it's a sideline throw.....so you know it's high and outside and that turns him around and he can't find it.
From what I was told, that is exactly what happened and the young WRs were on the verge of leaving.From what I read on here last year, it sounded like it dang near caused a mutiny last season when the clearly better QB was kept on the bench. Just IMO.
As Prof mentioned earlier, Saban is loyal to players (Christion Jones and Trey DePriest being the two best examples). However, the plays Saban tends to be loyal to are the ones entering their third or fourth year in the program. Jalen had been in Tuscaloosa a year. He didn't know the system that much more than Tua, especially since their was a new OC.Yup, and that's what's puzzling to me about this whole situation - we've all heard Saban preach over and over that every position is up for grabs, no one is assumed to be the starter, and the guy who puts the team in the best position to win will play.
No better way to undermine your recruiting prowess than to preach about how everyone competes for playing time then benching the obviously better player. It's not just Bama fans who see this happening.
Or Daboll was running his pro-offense, which is what Jalen and his dad wanted him to learn and why he came to Alabama.I don't think there is a football term for openness of that magnitude. The camera is zoomed out and Foster is the only player in the frame. JK could have punted it more accurately.
I'm considering buying into the conspiracy theory that Daboll was giving Jalen plays that he knew Tua could make.
I much prefer your formulation.Or Daboll was running his pro-offense, which is what Jalen and his dad wanted him to learn and why he came to Alabama.
I mean he didn't make the switch to Star Jackson or McCarron in 09 when GMAC had that awful stretch, I didn't expect he would've last year, except of course in the Title Game when there was no choice but move on to Tua.Yup, and that's what's puzzling to me about this whole situation - we've all heard Saban preach over and over that every position is up for grabs, no one is assumed to be the starter, and the guy who puts the team in the best position to win will play.
No better way to undermine your recruiting prowess than to preach about how everyone competes for playing time then benching the obviously better player. It's not just Bama fans who see this happening.
I think that this is spot on, but should he have been? Saban picks the starting QB. He picked Jalen. Daboll needed to change his play calls to leverage Jalen's strengths when it became apparent that Jalen simply could not run his offense.Or Daboll was running his pro-offense, which is what Jalen and his dad wanted him to learn and why he came to Alabama.
I have to admit that after knowing how this past week and 1st scrimmage went in combination with watching the John Doe video.... I'm starting to get really antsy.Yup, and that's what's puzzling to me about this whole situation - we've all heard Saban preach over and over that every position is up for grabs, no one is assumed to be the starter, and the guy who puts the team in the best position to win will play.
No better way to undermine your recruiting prowess than to preach about how everyone competes for playing time then benching the obviously better player. It's not just Bama fans who see this happening.
Remember, the media sees a very tiny portion of the practice. For all we know, Tua is getting all of the 1st team reps when they are not around.I have to admit that after knowing how this past week and 1st scrimmage went in combination with watching the John Doe video.... I'm starting to get really antsy.
There is pretty much no reason not to go ahead and start giving Tua 100% of the 1st string reps. No official announcement needs to be made but behind closed door make the dang change.
Of course a few people are saying that this HAS happened and that now the battle is between Jalen and Mac for the Backup role and that Mac is playing better in that battle too.
It's frustrating though to know just how far apart Tua and Jalen are in this competition yet it's still seemingly playing out.
watching through that 53 minute video - what exactly are the strengths of Jalen we should leverage? I mean, there were LOTS of examples of the FIRST read being wide open and Jalen not pulling the trigger on all sorts of routes, slants, stops, seams, outs, whatever. Should we have just switched to a pure read option? Would that have worked for the other 5 skill players on the field and used their abilities? Would Jeudy, Ruggs, Smith and others stick around for that or transfer out? With Jalen's propensity to also keep the ball on read options when he should hand off, what do Harris, harris, Robinson and Jacobs do? Are they willing to stay? Long term, are we able to recruit players who want to get to the NFL if we are running a system that doesn't match the skills they need to show to the league?I think that this is spot on, but should he have been? Saban picks the starting QB. He picked Jalen. Daboll needed to change his play calls to leverage Jalen's strengths when it became apparent that Jalen simply could not run his offense.
IMO, Daboll, for all his abilities, limited the effectiveness of your offense when Jalen was in there. He wanted Tua to play (and he wasn't wrong), but when the boss makes a call you get behind that call and make it work. Daboll didn't even try to make it work. He kept calling the same plays expecting Jalen to get better and when that didn't happen, Daboll refused to adjust (or simply didn't have the ability to adjust?).
What Jalen or his father wanted should not come into play. You do what is best for the team. You make it work. Daboll didn't even try. We can all fault Kiffin for his idiocy off the field, but he played to the strengths of his players. Daboll didn't even try to do this.
I'm not sure I agree with this as Bama's offense was more effective in 2017 than 2016.I think that this is spot on, but should he have been? Saban picks the starting QB. He picked Jalen. Daboll needed to change his play calls to leverage Jalen's strengths when it became apparent that Jalen simply could not run his offense.
IMO, Daboll, for all his abilities, limited the effectiveness of your offense when Jalen was in there. He wanted Tua to play (and he wasn't wrong), but when the boss makes a call you get behind that call and make it work. Daboll didn't even try to make it work. He kept calling the same plays expecting Jalen to get better and when that didn't happen, Daboll refused to adjust (or simply didn't have the ability to adjust?).
What Jalen or his father wanted should not come into play. You do what is best for the team. You make it work. Daboll didn't even try. We can all fault Kiffin for his idiocy off the field, but he played to the strengths of his players. Daboll didn't even try to do this.
IMO that was for one reason - Tua. You ran an aggressive offense when he came into the game every time, no matter the score. You did not try to shorten games or run out the clock - you attacked. Add Tua's amazing talent and you produce a ton of points that you would not have produced in previous seasons.I'm not sure I agree with this as Bama's offense was more effective in 2017 than 2016.
Look at your offense in 2016 for the answers. You have to keep 8 players out of the box. When they are not afraid of the vertical passing game, you have to spread them out horizontally. You did that with great effect in 2017, even against the best defenses in the country. You did not even try to do that in 2017.watching through that 53 minute video - what exactly are the strengths of Jalen we should leverage?