We have a lot of 50% parenting going on because a lot of kids only have 50% of their parents. Absent dads are a lot of what is wrong today.
I played a heavy metal album backwards once. You know what I heard? mphtdharuopa ahwtrnr sskaaycbnrmn. It clearly told me I should be an architect. Some messages were positive.you joke now, but backwards masking on heavy metal albums was real.
and blue jeans and duck tails.
I hear what you're saying but the smart phone/social media influence is different both in quality and quantity. That's coming from the perspective of almost eight decades above dirt...Has the internet destroyed a generation?
Has rap music destroyed a generation?
Have video games destroyed a generation?
Has rock music destroyed a generation?
Has showing too much ankle destroyed a generation?
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the idea behind the initial article is the same in general. We don't know whether this is "destroying" a generation or not. Depending on where the world goes it may be saving a generation and they may be the first wave of a major change to our species/society. My parents are always amazed with what I can do effortlessly on computers - although they probably thought I was wasting away my younger years constantly being on them and destroying my life in the same way a lot of people feel about the phone thing.I hear what you're saying but the smart phone/social media influence is different both in quality and quantity. That's coming from the perspective of almost eight decades above dirt...
my dad was an electrical engineer who loved to tinker with stuff. interestingly enough, he thought computers (and especially video games) were a complete waste of time, so we never had them in the house and i never owned one until i was in my late 20s.I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the idea behind the initial article is the same in general. We don't know whether this is "destroying" a generation or not. Depending on where the world goes it may be saving a generation and they may be the first wave of a major change to our species/society. My parents are always amazed with what I can do effortlessly on computers - although they probably thought I was wasting away my younger years constantly being on them and destroying my life in the same way a lot of people feel about the phone thing.
I also can't stand the obsession by the younger generation with the things but it's also a different world. Just like it was with computers and video games, etc. I just think it's too early for sweeping statements like the article.
My favorite is still my ex-FIL insisting in 1996 that the Internet was going to be nothing but "a passing fad" like the CB radio was.......my dad was an electrical engineer who loved to tinker with stuff. interestingly enough, he thought computers (and especially video games) were a complete waste of time, so we never had them in the house and i never owned one until i was in my late 20s.
In general I agree with this but as noted......you actually had some time AWAY from the video games or whatever no matter how much time you DID spend on them.I don't necessarily disagree with you, but the idea behind the initial article is the same in general. We don't know whether this is "destroying" a generation or not. Depending on where the world goes it may be saving a generation and they may be the first wave of a major change to our species/society. My parents are always amazed with what I can do effortlessly on computers - although they probably thought I was wasting away my younger years constantly being on them and destroying my life in the same way a lot of people feel about the phone thing.
I also can't stand the obsession by the younger generation with the things but it's also a different world. Just like it was with computers and video games, etc. I just think it's too early for sweeping statements like the article.
Somewhere out there is a young girl. Neither she nor her parents know it yet, but they're going to be the second-biggest beneficiaries of your and your wife's efforts.Thank you for the kind words. We are far from perfect parents but we do put everything we have into it and do the best we can. This past weekend my wife and I received one of the best compliments a parent can get regarding their children. My oldest son plays Dixie Youth Baseball and they've been practicing for about a month and had a pre-season tournament this past weekend. After one of the games the head coach and one of the assistant coaches asked to speak with my wife and me privately. As we were walking over to a private area we were talking to each other saying "What in the world could this be about? What could possibly be wrong?". Nothing was wrong. They proceeded to tell us that our son (and I quote) is "*pure class" and "the most respectful, well behaved and coachable player we've ever coached." That made us so proud and was worth more than any game winning homerun, or anything he could have done on the field. Talk about a proud Dad struttin' around like a peacock after hearing that. LOL!
*As I looked up in the sky I saw a hologram of Barrett Jones slow clapping*
This is true; and bad parenting is largely the result of the rejection of truth and the true God. The rejection has mostly been little by little, IMO, beginning with the gilded age of late 19th, then the progressive era, roaring 20s, depression, new deal, WW2, beatnik gen, hippie gen, Reagan, then the escalating decline from the 90s forward - but the foundation was laid long before the 90s. The 90s til now has just been a more brazen expression of symptoms. Not everything about all of those periods was bad, but except for the depression and WW2, they were characterized by an increasing moral decline (i.e., the rejection of God) in the US. So, no smartphones haven't destroyed a generation, they just provide another circumstance that further exposes and facilitates the emptiness of life, individually, thus collectively, without the true God.My opinion is the smartphone hasn't destroyed a generation. Bad parenting has. Out of all the sentences in that article. This is the one that stuck out to me most:
I believe this statement to be true. I also believe it is the reason we see kids interact and deal with each other in a much more violent way than ever before. A kid cannot have a smart phone unless the parent allows it, pays for it and turns the kid loose with it. The issue is parenting, IMO. I think the question that needs to be asked is, "Why don't parents want to spend more time with their children rather than giving them a device to occupy or 'babysit' them?" There is no such thing as idle or unused time. Their time will be occupied by something or someone. The parents are the primary decision makers on how their time is spent and with whom.
You think the rejection of God started in the 19th c.? You may want to take out your smart phone and Google that.This is true; and bad parenting is largely the result of the rejection of truth and the true God. The rejection has mostly been little by little, IMO, beginning with the gilded age of late 19th, then the progressive era, roaring 20s, depression, new deal, WW2, beatnik gen, hippie gen, Reagan, then the escalating decline from the 90s forward - but the foundation was laid long before the 90s. The 90s til now has just been a more brazen expression of symptoms. Not everything about all of those periods was bad, but except for the depression and WW2, they were characterized by an increasing moral decline (i.e., the rejection of God) in the US. So, no smartphones haven't destroyed a generation, they just provide another circumstance that further exposes and facilitates the emptiness of life, individually, thus collectively, without the true God.
Of course not - the rejection of God began with Cain. I was speaking of it's development over time in the U.S. IMO, the decline that has continued mostly unabated to this day, began in the latter part of the 19th century. This is the ultimate reason behind the various "social/personal" problems that exist.You think the rejection of God started in the 19th c.? You may want to take out your smart phone and Google that.
It still could be.My favorite is still my ex-FIL insisting in 1996 that the Internet was going to be nothing but "a passing fad" like the CB radio was.......
He just didn't like Al Gore.My favorite is still my ex-FIL insisting in 1996 that the Internet was going to be nothing but "a passing fad" like the CB radio was.......