I don't understand how this new fair catch rule is going to fix anything. You're not really eliminating most of the danger from kickoffs. The only player you protect here is the return man.
Touchbacks being placed at the 20 yard line would encourage returns.Touchbacks go back to 20yd line
Make crackback blocks illegal
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Just keep in mind that this would result in more kickoffs intentionally kicked high and short. It is to the kicking team's advantage as it makes it easier to cover a kickoff and bring down the runner short of the 20.I do tend to agree with kicking it from the 40 yard line if they're going to do this fair catch rule too because it clearly makes the default decision for the returner to be kneel in endzone or fair catch. You just can't expect to get a return on when the coverage team is five yards closer than they are now...which is already close enough for Alabama to employ the "just short of endzone" kick and coverage.
Like I said - I'm all for eliminating unnecessary injuries, but how many people get injured on kickoffs? I'm sure it happens, but I can't recall the last time I saw someone injured on a KO. Maybe addressing a problem that isn't?The reality - the only way to avoid kickoff injuries is to eliminate kickoffs. I hate it, but there it is.
I don't trust league data, but they claim that kickoff injuries are the most severe injuries. So maybe it isn't the number of kickoff injuries but the type?Like I said - I'm all for eliminating unnecessary injuries, but how many people get injured on kickoffs? I'm sure it happens, but I can't recall the last time I saw someone injured on a KO. Maybe addressing a problem that isn't?
Could be.I don't trust league data, but they claim that kickoff injuries are the most severe injuries. So maybe it isn't the number of kickoff injuries but the type?
Under Schiano's proposal, instead of 50-48 "shootouts" in leagues like the Big-12, instead you'd see 84-17 blowouts, where one team keeps possession of the ball almost continuously throughout the entire game.Schiano suggested the scoring team, rather than attempt an onside kick, take over the ball on its 30 on a fourth-and-15 play. The team can either go for it -- trying to retain the ball -- or punt. Statistics show that injuries on punts aren't as bad for as frequent as on kickoffs.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...ffs-are-on-their-way-out-of-college-football/
Since punts are much safer than kickoffs why not punt instead of kicking off. Punt from your own 40, or from the 50. That way a return or a fumble is still possible.
Also (hint, hint) the NCAA could reverse some of its decisions favoring the O. and cut down on kickoffs by cutting down on the 45-40 and 55-60 scoring matches. I miss the days when a 21 point lead really meant something. LESS scoring equals LESS KOs.
The REALITY is there are probably a dozen reasonable and rational methods that could reduce the number of injuries on KO's, WITHOUT removing the KO from the game. As Redwood suggests - the scoring team could Punt from the 30 (or even the 35 or 40, for that matter). We could KO from the 40 as Saban has suggested. And there are doubtless other changes that could help.It isn't kickoffs per se that are inherently dangerous (they don't have this discussion in rugby, for instance), but rather the tackling on kickoffs. I'll admit I don't know how to solve it, but modifying the definition of a legal tackle in order to retain the kickoff would be better than these Schiano-esque proposals to eliminate kickoffs altogether.
It is interesting to watch Football helmet technology evolve. And yet...the helmet designs still cannot solve that issue as of yet. So yeah....I think the pressure will continue as well. We will continue to see players ejected for playing Defense, but we will most likely continue to see what most would agree are useless rule manipulation until it just doesn't seem like football anymore. But I GET that we need to protect these boys from brain damage. I try to keep that in mind too.It will more likely be concussion after effects which end football...
I agree with you but they may be talking about injuries to the brain we don't see. Reuben'***** on Fournette is a prime example of what happens when two speeding bullets hit each other and the effects down the road with CTE that come later.Could be.
Just seems sad to remove something that can be game-changing because of injuries that seem to never happen.
But studies have shown (and continue to show) that it's not the massive hits that do the most damage, it's the repetitive smaller hits (such as a DL / LB colliding with an OL on every snap).I agree with you but they may be talking about injuries to the brain we don't see. Reuben'***** on Fournette is a prime example of what happens when two speeding bullets hit each other and the effects down the road with CTE that come later.
I agree with you but they may be talking about injuries to the brain we don't see. Reuben'***** on Fournette is a prime example of what happens when two speeding bullets hit each other and the effects down the road with CTE that come later.
Yes, but the length of games is more a product of commercials than actual playing time...The length of games has become an issue in recent years. Eliminating kickoffs completely would seem to save a lot of time over the course of a game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's little doubt that the networks will see elimination of kick-offs as an opportunity to insert advertising. It will probably lengthen the game.Yes, but the length of games is more a product of commercials than actual playing time...