It's all about the big picture.So what is the message now from the Democratic party? Strategy?
It's all about the big picture.So what is the message now from the Democratic party? Strategy?
CALIFORNIA: PRO-CHOICE ACTIVIST PROUDLY BREAKS WORLD RECORD BY GETTING HER 27TH ABORTIONIt starts and ends with killing babies.
They might put her on deck for 2024. Who better to represent CoachJeff's Democratic Party?A 34-year-old Pro-Choice activist has officially broken a world record after receiving her 27th abortion.
The historic operation was performed at the Sacramento Street Health Center and required Elena Travis, 34, to visit the abortion clinic three consecutive times because she was 24 weeks pregnant.
Elena Travis, 34, a medical school student who hopes to one day perform abortions herself, believes abortion is a right and hopes to inspire other women to have it practiced on them by showing others that it is a safe and healthy procedure.
Bernie Sanders says hi.I'm interested in seeing how all this plays out. The NY-14 primary was a perfect storm: A powerful incumbent cut down in large part to his Wall Street ties. But it was a highly Democratic district to begin with (and gerrymandered districts also breed extremism). While I'm not sure that the democrats need to move farther left across the board, distancing themselves from Wall Street trikes me as a must if they hope to reach out to disaffected moderates. At the same time, raising sufficient money without Wall Street is problematic in this Citizens United dystopia.
but what about our plans to outlaw urinals as they are a manifestation of the fascist patriarchyCALIFORNIA: PRO-CHOICE ACTIVIST PROUDLY BREAKS WORLD RECORD BY GETTING HER 27TH ABORTION
They might put her on deck for 2024. Who better to represent CoachJeff's Democratic Party?
it does appear that civility is again prominent in the talking points. i wonder if we will get another thread about itand Civility.
Exemplars of civility:it does appear that civility is again prominent in the talking points. i wonder if we will get another thread about it
The first bill Democrats plan to introduce and pass if they win control of the House of Representatives on Nov. 6 will be a comprehensive package of campaign finance, voting rights, redistricting and ethics reforms.
The presumptive H.R. 1 will be based on a House resolution introduced in 2018 by Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.) and co-sponsored by 165 Democratic House members, including the entire party leadership.
“Reform is going to be the first thing out of the gate,” he said.
The bill will include the creation of a small-donor public financing system for congressional elections, the restoration of the Voting Rights Act, nationwide automatic voter registration, nonpartisan redistricting reforms for congressional elections and a host of ethics reforms to rein in corruption in Congress and the executive branch.
The first part ain’t happening - and Dems know it.
Not surprising........Job Number One is to protect their party.
That's fine. It will help them win Senate seats in 2020 if the GOP is on-record as the pro-corruption party. And the Dems will have already written legislation that could be quickly passed.It will never pass the Senate
1) The voter's choice is between (1) a party that says they want to reign in corruption, (2) a party that actively does not, and (3) abstention. Doesn't seem like much of a choice if this issue is important to you.too many wealthy donors won’t like it and if you think Pelosi and Hoyer are going to let it pass without pulling the teeth out of it, you’re tripping. They will not bite the hand that feeds them, because the “public” hand won’t give those dinosaurs jack squat and they know it. Unless they are planning to retire; in that case, it might be possible.
... um, what are you talking about?Not surprising........Job Number One is to protect their party.
At some point, maybe they will "get around to" the Health Care issue, that is being reported as the Number One concern of Americans.
And the beat goes on......
I agree reform is needed but fear the unintended consequences and additional government involvement.
you are assuming he actually knows? or is the question rhetorical?... um, what are you talking about?