Saw this on the TV last night:
http://www.wkrg.com/news/mobile-county/mobile-private-school-sues-ahsaa-over-competitive-balance-rule/1197201243
Mobile private school sues AHSAA over competitive balance rule
By: WKRG Staff
https://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2018/05/st_pauls_files_federal_suit_ag.html
Alabama private school sues to abolish competitive balance rule
Updated May 24, 5:14 PM; Posted May 24, 2:05 PM
Have to say I'm 100% in favor of St. Paul's on this. AND I completely agree that Safety IS a real issue.
It seems to me the new "Competitive Balance" rule is solely motivated by Prejudice and JEALOUSY - designed to PUNISH private schools that excel in sports. Isn't the POINT of sports to try to win? But now they punish you for it?
The multiplier, likewise, is a petty and vindictive rule designed to punish private schools for "recruiting" - a cherished tradition that's UNIVERSALLY practiced by every major PUBLIC HS "football power" in this State. But somehow, if a tiny private school does it, suddenly it's "Evil" and "Unfair"?????
Full Disclosure - My kids all went to St.Paul's (though none of them played football). By actual enrollment, St. Paul's is Borderline 4A - Literally only FIVE (5) STUDENTS from being in 3A. - but thanks to the "Multiplier" they play in 5A. NOW, thanks to being successful against larger 5A schools, the AHSAA has decided that St. Paul's (with a barely 4A enrollment) must compete in class 6A. So in effect, SPS will be playing almost THREE Classifications Above their actual enrollment.
IS Safety really a factor? I think its a legitimate concern.
When my kids were in school I watched St. Paul's squads line up against schools (some of whom are now 6A, like Vigor, Saraland and Spanish Fort) - and in a LOT of those games they looked like a JV team lining up against Seniors. Sometimes almost every kid on an opponent's OL And DL were half-a-head (or more) taller than the SPS kid they were lining up against.
I can well remember a game St. Paul's played at Spanish Fort about 4-5 years ago. At the time, Sp. Fort had more kids in their BAND than SPS had in their 10th -12th grade classes Combined. Honestly, the game looked like a re-enactment of "The Longest Yard" - by the second half, SPS kids were being injured to the point of needing assistance to get off the field, it seemed like every 5-10 minutes.
It just doesn't seem fair to me. IMAGINE if Alabama was penalized for being "Too Good" - and we had to play one game every season against an NFL team, and that game counted in our standings for the SEC Title and for the P_ayoffs.
Would anyone think that was fair to UA??
http://www.wkrg.com/news/mobile-county/mobile-private-school-sues-ahsaa-over-competitive-balance-rule/1197201243
Mobile private school sues AHSAA over competitive balance rule
By: WKRG Staff
https://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2018/05/st_pauls_files_federal_suit_ag.html
Alabama private school sues to abolish competitive balance rule
Updated May 24, 5:14 PM; Posted May 24, 2:05 PM
Have to say I'm 100% in favor of St. Paul's on this. AND I completely agree that Safety IS a real issue.
It seems to me the new "Competitive Balance" rule is solely motivated by Prejudice and JEALOUSY - designed to PUNISH private schools that excel in sports. Isn't the POINT of sports to try to win? But now they punish you for it?
The multiplier, likewise, is a petty and vindictive rule designed to punish private schools for "recruiting" - a cherished tradition that's UNIVERSALLY practiced by every major PUBLIC HS "football power" in this State. But somehow, if a tiny private school does it, suddenly it's "Evil" and "Unfair"?????
Full Disclosure - My kids all went to St.Paul's (though none of them played football). By actual enrollment, St. Paul's is Borderline 4A - Literally only FIVE (5) STUDENTS from being in 3A. - but thanks to the "Multiplier" they play in 5A. NOW, thanks to being successful against larger 5A schools, the AHSAA has decided that St. Paul's (with a barely 4A enrollment) must compete in class 6A. So in effect, SPS will be playing almost THREE Classifications Above their actual enrollment.
IS Safety really a factor? I think its a legitimate concern.
When my kids were in school I watched St. Paul's squads line up against schools (some of whom are now 6A, like Vigor, Saraland and Spanish Fort) - and in a LOT of those games they looked like a JV team lining up against Seniors. Sometimes almost every kid on an opponent's OL And DL were half-a-head (or more) taller than the SPS kid they were lining up against.
I can well remember a game St. Paul's played at Spanish Fort about 4-5 years ago. At the time, Sp. Fort had more kids in their BAND than SPS had in their 10th -12th grade classes Combined. Honestly, the game looked like a re-enactment of "The Longest Yard" - by the second half, SPS kids were being injured to the point of needing assistance to get off the field, it seemed like every 5-10 minutes.
It just doesn't seem fair to me. IMAGINE if Alabama was penalized for being "Too Good" - and we had to play one game every season against an NFL team, and that game counted in our standings for the SEC Title and for the P_ayoffs.
Would anyone think that was fair to UA??