Yup. Told a friend the other day that this change (assumed it was coming) will disproportionately benefit the powerhouse programs. Pretty soon people will be complaining that Saban is getting all the good, experienced players, too...Know Saban has a GA or analyst going through every possible SEC player to see who could make a difference.
Between redshirt years and enrolling in January, yes.With so many players viewing college as a launching pad for an NFL career, and thus being less than stellar students, would there be that many potential graduate transfers available?
No. It's all SEC sports.Is this annual meeting just for football?
Like most rules they make to stop him do as well.This is going to help Alabama far more than any other program in the conference.
If they aren't already saying that. Individuals involved behind the scenes have to foresee this as a possibility. So for fun, who is going to be a good first target?But, mark my words, one day Saban is going to make other schools say "We really wish we hadn't passed that rule now," or look for new ways to prevent him from doing it.
Not so sure of that, BIG. Kids at schools like ours who never see the field now have a direct path to other high-profile SEC programs where playing time will be easier to get. I doubt we lose any starters, but this rule makes transferring a lot smoother for our backups.This is going to help Alabama far more than any other program in the conference.
Only if they've already graduated.Not so sure of that, BIG. Kids at schools like ours who never see the field now have a direct path to other high-profile SEC schools. I doubt we lose any starters, but this rule makes transferring a lot smoother for our backups.
If you wish to improve your draft chances and get a ring, then yes.As for attracting players from other schools ... If you're a stud at, say, Tennessee or either of the Mississippi schools, do you really want to spend your last year of eligibility fighting every minute for playing time at UA?
Only if they've already graduated.
Also keep in mind that this rule only affects transfers to other SEC schools.
If you wish to improve your draft chances and get a ring, then yes.
There's a reason Alabama's promotions focus on NFL drafts / earnings and rings...
Just ask Jake Coker.
It also makes the path as smooth as butter for lesser programs to develop players into what is ultimately a football version of “one and done.” If you are good enough then the path is up to you: Take a few extra classes. Graduate with eligibility remaining. Go to Alabama. Play one year. Go to the NFL.Not so sure of that, BIG. Kids at schools like ours who never see the field now have a direct path to other high-profile SEC schools. I doubt we lose any starters, but this rule makes transferring a lot smoother for our backups.
As for attracting players from other schools ... If you're a stud at, say, Tennessee or either of the Mississippi schools, do you really want to spend your last year of eligibility fighting every minute for playing time at UA?
This will be interesting to watch.
* This *I really do think this will be a decision the other schools regret later. They are making it now because Saban doesn't want it, and think it will hurt him. But he does everything better than any of them already. Now you are going to give him the okay to poach grad transfers within the conference, and don't think he will do that better than you can too? I call this a lack of thinking things through on their end, but I suppose I am glad that some players who really do have a genuine need to place themselves in a different situation can do so without it hurting their eligibility. But, mark my words, one day Saban is going to make other schools say "We really wish we hadn't passed that rule now," or look for new ways to prevent him from doing it.