Didn't realize I did that.....just made a statement that it would make me nervous.I'm not going to blame the victim...
Didn't realize I did that.....just made a statement that it would make me nervous.I'm not going to blame the victim...
I wasn’t trying to. It is just very risky to do so. You could lose it just as easily as it being stolen or seized.I'm not going to blame the victim...
They must declare the money at $10k. Perhaps there is some confusion on that point.That is not correct. I'm not quite sure what you mean, but, if you think that it's illegal to possess more than $10K, that's wrong. If he redeposited it, the bank would have to report it and he might have to explain how he got it, which, according to his attorney, he can. However, I didn't think we'd reached the point where the government can outlaw carrying your own cash around...
I am confused on the point of the 10K requirement. For example, if I had an agreement to purchase property in NYC with cash and I chose to travel from Chicago with the cash I don't understand what should prevent me from doing that legally.They must declare the money at $10k. Perhaps there is some confusion on that point.
He must declare before leaving the country was my point, not to say he had to declare on the first flight, which was domestic.I am confused on the point of the 10K requirement. For example, if I had an agreement to purchase property in NYC with cash and I chose to travel from Chicago with the cash I don't understand what should prevent me from doing that legally.
If I chose to carry that cash to Brazil, for example, they would require me to declare it in customs and it could be limited by their customs regulations. I don't recall being required to file a customs form upon my departure from the US but was required to have one completed upon arrival in a foreign country.
I have understood that I could not re-enter the US with more than 10K but do not understand how that would apply to a domestic flight.
It would be beneficial to have clearer understanding in the matter.
That was the reason I said I didn't know what he meant...They must declare the money at $10k. Perhaps there is some confusion on that point.
I agree. Right now, it looks like just a presumption that he must have obtained it illegally. You are correct in that international is a totally different matter. Once, I crossed over from Austria to Italy at a little-used pass (actually where they later discovered Oetzi the Iceman, but he was under 20' of ice and snow when I crossed). My MIL was along and she was notorious for carrying too much cash. Italy was undergoing one of its periodic Lire crises and the most you could take out of the country was the equivalent of $50 - unless you declared it on the way in. I asked Rosalie how much she had. She answered that she had $5K in a money belt. Since that was 1972, that would be the equivalent of just under $30K today. However, that's not the entire story. That was just before the dollar crash and the leaving of the dollar being pegged to gold. So, the purchasing power of a dollar was far, far more than it is against other currencies now. All went smoothly, once they realized we were Americans and not Germans. They were from southern Italy and deeply prejudiced against Germans, the main group using that pass. I had been using German, since I don't know Italian sufficiently to converse. So, you are correct. It's a good idea to know the currency regulations of the country you're traveling to...I am confused on the point of the 10K requirement. For example, if I had an agreement to purchase property in NYC with cash and I chose to travel from Chicago with the cash I don't understand what should prevent me from doing that legally.
If I chose to carry that cash to Brazil, for example, they would require me to declare it in customs and it could be limited by their customs regulations. I don't recall being required to file a customs form upon my departure from the US but was required to have one completed upon arrival in a foreign country.
I have understood that I could not re-enter the US with more than 10K but do not understand how that would apply to a domestic flight.
It would be beneficial to have clearer understanding in the matter.
But if the first flight was part of an international trip, then it could be considered to be an international flight even if he wasn’t leaving the country on that leg.He must declare before leaving the country was my point, not to say he had to declare on the first flight, which was domestic.
That, apparently, is the $58,100 question.But if the first flight was part of an international trip, then it could be considered to be an international flight even if he wasn’t leaving the country on that leg.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So is Birmingham-Shuttlesworth.IDK if it has any significance, but Cleveland is an international airport...
They could pass laws saying rape is okay and I'm not going to rape anyone.I blame the Courts.
Let's celebrate when our guy exerts presidential powers and cry when their guy uses it against us!Big government is awesome; we should have more of it.
Funny how that all gets justified. And we have many threads on here to demonstrate.Let's celebrate when our guy exerts presidential powers and cry when their guy uses it against us!
Oh, wait....we already do that.