Yup! Won't happen anytime soon, but I'd fork over whatever the price for an all-electric Land Cruiser. I'm on the waiting list for a Bollinger B1 - electric vehicles will be beastly off-road.I'm warming up to electric vehicles. The instant torque and broad powerband of an electric motor is mind boggling.
I am doing my part by eating the animals whose flatulence is ruining the environment. Vegetarians are ruining this planet by eating plants that produce oxygen and eating my food's food.This whole thing can blow up before I become a vegetarian. :smile:
there are a lot of little things that can be done that collectively would make a huge difference. unfortunately, lots of folks get defensive if someone, especially the government, tells them what to do.While out walking I reflected on the discussion on global warming and the general feeling that we haven't done nearly enough.
I was responsible for Environmental Affairs for a large manufacturing company and while not being a technical person some of it did rub off.
Just for background the EPA was created under the Nixon Administration in 1970 and has been generally supported by both Republican and Democratic administrations up to the present. The Clean Air and Clean Water Acts that were passed and supported by both parties have been transformative in reducing industrial emissions from all sources.
It is not at all unusual for a large manufacturer today to have 0 solid waste going into a landfill and 0 VOC emissions going into the atmosphere. It is not an overstatement to say that every ounce of petroleum products, organic compounds and other chemicals that enter the manufacturing site must be accounted for and reported. Every gallon of water released is controlled and is monitored before release and at the treatment facility.
Today all coatings are water based. I believe it would be factual to say that there are no products manufactured in the US that were coated with a substance containing VOCs
We can debate if today's refrigerant is environmentally sound our not but $ millions were invested in developing compressors and refrigerant that could attain the Clean Air standard.
By the way the scrubbers required on coal fired powered plants by the Clean Air Act have dramatically reduced particulate emissions. It is still a dirty process that creates tremendous waste products that needs to be brought to an end
Have we done enough! No Has the EPA become overly bureaucratic? Absolutely
Where do we go from here?
Defending their “team” is what they do [emoji6]. I agree, while to a much lesser degree, the D’s have failed in this. The R’s, well, they’re just total morons (which insults morons everywhere). The two parties are not equally culpable on this issue but that doesn’t mean they haven’t let us down. Which is what I presume you’re trying to say.And of course you guys cannot get past the arguing about which team is better, ignoring that fact that the few positives Obama accomplished were easily undone because he wasn't able to take advantage of democratic control of congress. They could have enacted massive changes in law and policy but wasted their political revenue on other things.
I'm only comparing the two to point our that neither has accomplished much. Yes the Dems actually tried to do something, and yes the repubs are actively trying to remove all of that progress. But that doesn't mean the Dems actually accomplished what they could have, what they should have, based on what they claim to believe.
Pretending otherwise is just defending your team while ignoring the obvious. Our leaders from both sides have failed us for more than three decades. Just drop the 'but the other team is worse' mentality for once.
Thank you for succinctly clarifying my point.The two parties are not equally culpable on this issue but that doesn’t mean they haven’t let us down. Which is what I presume you’re trying to say.
I seem to remember during Obama's first term he had his hands full trying to salvage the economy in the face of united and publicly stated opposition to whatever he might try to accomplish from the GOP.And of course you guys cannot get past the arguing about which team is better, ignoring that fact that the few positives Obama accomplished were easily undone because he wasn't able to take advantage of democratic control of congress. They could have enacted massive changes in law and policy but wasted their political revenue on other things.
Yeah, I do. He got Obamacare, but there was little focus early on in helping save the entire planet.I seem to remember during Obama's first term he had his hands full trying to salvage the economy in the face of united and publicly stated opposition to whatever he might try to accomplish from the GOP.
And now you want to blame Obama for not passing more effective legislation?
Well put.Could Obama have done more? Sure. But he did pass the first ever federal limit on carbon pollution, helped forge an international climate agreement, directed his EPA to noticeably increase fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, and preserved 260 million acres for future generations by designating 19 national monuments for public use.
In contrast, Trump has rolled back Obama's anti-pollution legislation, withdrawn from that international climate agreement, reversed the heightened EPA standards, and begun selling our National Parks to miners.
There is absolutely no comparison, and to pretend otherwise is absurd.
Thank you. There is work to be done at the macro level for sure but as you say that has less than a 50/50 chance of happening. To echo what you are saying about what we can do at an individual level:focusing on the individual level, what are we as individuals who are posting our thoughts on this thread doing to help the environment? how have we, as individuals in our daily lives, changed our habits to help Mother Earth? i am of the opinion that making individual changes will help the environment out much more than worrying about enacting macro gov't policies....since in this day and age its likely to alienate roughly 1/2 of the populace to such new policy(ies). as for me, driving slower, driving an electric vehicle, being vegetarian, planting trees in my yard, using energy efficient lighting in my house, installing smart thermometers in my house are my ways of doing what i need to do to make a small incremental positive change to my part of the world.
Don't you know that your only choice is to denigrate one party and make excuses for the other? You have a binary choice. Thinking for yourself is silly. You have to wear a uniform or else we don't know who to shoot at, which means we shoot at people not wearing uniforms.Yeah, I do. He got Obamacare, but there was little focus early on in helping save the entire planet.
Again, do I hold him as culpable as the repubs? No. And I've said that over and over.
But to give him a pass when he had the opportunity to affect real change over something as important as climate change is partisanship. That game is precisely why we're where we are now.
Our elected leaders have let us down for three decades now, and Obama was part of the problem. He holds the least blame, imo, but he doesn't get a pass. That's the gig.
you must wear the ribbonDon't you know that your only choice is to denigrate one party and make excuses for the other? You have a binary choice. Thinking for yourself is silly. You have to wear a uniform or else we don't know who to shoot at, which means we shoot at people not wearing uniforms.
Admitting to ignorance on this one. Ribbon?you must wear the ribbon
it's from seinfeld. kramer wouldn't wear the red ribbon for the aids walkAdmitting to ignorance on this one. Ribbon?
Just found that on youtube before you posted. Good stuff. I laughed.it's from seinfeld. kramer wouldn't wear the red ribbon for the aids walk
One of the country’s major federal science agencies seems to have been forced to abandon climate change research as a key organizational focus, the New York Times revealed this week. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Organization is responsible for managing the National Weather Service and using its network of satellites to forecast the effects of climate change. Rather than concentrate on resiliency efforts, NOAA is now charged with prioritizing “a safe, secure and growing economy empowered through accurate, reliable and timely environmental information,” according to a slideshow presented by the agency’s acting director at a Department of Commerce meeting.
The republicans aren't morons or ignorant. They simply are satisfying the expectations of those that put them into officeDefending their “team” is what they do [emoji6]. I agree, while to a much lesser degree, the D’s have failed in this. The R’s, well, they’re just total morons (which insults morons everywhere). The two parties are not equally culpable on this issue but that doesn’t mean they haven’t let us down. Which is what I presume you’re trying to say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk