Okay, done being nice. I'm dropping the veneer of civility here.
For crying out loud, I just linked it, and the butthurt reaction from Ben and his droogs is as good an indicator as any.
Hardly. As I said, she doesn’t owe him squat. She’s an honest to goodness presumptive member of Congress. He’s a pundit. In what world should she entertain him and his fan base? None! He's deliberately being a clown and he knows it, even if his fans don’t.
You won’t get much disagreement from me there.
It’s called an analogy, fella. Ben knows this, which is why the intellectual dishonesty of him characterizing it as libelslander is so obvious. Even most of his droogs know it.
1. I don’t him as butt hurt. If anything to me, she looks like that with the name calling. (Cat calling)
2. No she doesn’t owe him anything. That’s not the point of a debate though. Not that I’m a huge fan or anything, but that could have been a big win for her and her ideology if she was to really own him, but he would eat her up just on the facts. Something she’s incredibly putrid on.
3. We are good here.
4. I know the analogy, but that’s basically calling him sexist in politics when he’s actually far from it. Cat-calling? That’s just too funny. It’s like it’s the 70s/80s or something.
To me, every time she’s speak she hurts her own cause. I think she’s has a degree from Boston U or somewhere in economics or something close but she runs from the economic questions. She tries to backtrack on her statements when even the liberal media calls her on it.
I do applaud her on how she got the nomination though. I mean, who goes door to door anymore? Heck, I would even vote for someone like that if she didn’t run on the democratic socialist platform.
iPhone[emoji208]
