It's a double edge sword. Both have their pro's and con's. You can condition all you want in practice but being game conditioned to play a full four quarters takes actually playing full games. But I agree, you run the risk of season ending injuries and I also agree that by the end of the year Bama teams are beat up and nicked up all across the line up. I brought this up because it's one thing to play a full half and maybe a series or two in the third then pull starters. But with this offense, we're pulling starters and going into mop up before halftime. These guys are barely breaking a good game sweat.Wouldn't it suck more if they suffer a season ending injury in a blowout? I'd think the conditioning stuff is better done in practice where they can avoid things like chop blocks and the like.
I can't think of a better example than the Tua situation. In the first game he hit his head and looked a little shook up. Fortunately it wasn't too bad, but the less of those the better. Then last game he was getting looked at on the sidelines and he went into the locker room early. I'd say it is to Alabama's advantage that he didn't have to play more, and I'd take healthy over well conditioned but beat up (and some Alabama teams have been very beat up late in the season).
I'll also point out that it concerns me that Tua started cramping up and had to go to the locker room before halftime. I don't remember hearing the temperature in Oxford that night, but to already be cramping that early in the game is a bit concerning. I'm not sure if he just wasn't properly hydrated but good lord, our scoring drives were lightning fast. It wasn't like he was out there for extended periods of time.
Last edited: