Maybe I missed something before yours, but I reviewed back and it was you that brought up the Clemson game that was nearly 2 years ago. Your post...I keep seeing people argue he couldn't beat Clemson though, like the whole offensive coordinator thing didn't happen. I'm not defending his performance, I'm saying you don't pull the rug out from under the guy and he plays better, you don't screw up when you get the plays in, and it makes it harder for Clemson to do what they did. I can watch and pinpoint plays where the play calling was an issue, where Clemson sniffed things out, etc.. So yeah each time I see someone act as though the coordinator situation central to the performance, wasn't an issue, I'm probably going to point out what I think should have been obvious and yet remains a consistent omission.
Jalen could have beaten Clemson. That's not a defense of his performance, that's just derived from watching the game and pointing out an issue that was obvious.
Edit: Just so we're clear on what happened, the way some people talk about it is like Alabama got beat by three touchdowns or something. Alabama got beat on the last drive of the game after taking the lead with very little time remaining. Yes, I can point out numerous things, including Jalen's play that would have resulted in a loss, but it's just categorically false to come to the conclusion he couldn't win, because he obviously could have.
KrAzY3
BamaNation Hall of Fame Join DateJan 2006Posts8,006Post Thanks / Like
I just can't buy that. The only thing that came between Hurts and a championship against Clemson was a last second score.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------