A team plays every team in one division in the other conference. That gives them one game against a team that finished in each spot last year.
They play a complete division in their own conference. They now have two games against every spot from last year.
They play everyone in their division twice. They now have four games against the other three spots and two against their own spot.
Finally, they play the other two teams that finished in their own spot in their conference last year.
That gives them four games against teams in each spot from last year.
Thanks - I see how that worked out. But you realize that this does not create "equal" schedules, right? It is made this way to make it harder on conference winners and easier on weaker teams. The purpose was never to create "equal" schedule, but to create competitive games. They want conference winners matched up with other conference winners, 2nd place teams matched up with 2nd place teams, etc., etc., all the way down the board. It is about the money, not schedule equality.
The numbers make the schedule look equal, but they are not. Than add the fact that the better teams have to play night games and on Mondays and you create real inequity. The choices for those teams is far from equal. Those games are all about $$$.