We are on a 7-1 plan now. He was just saying he liked a 3-5 plan.Sure about that? I don't think we've played South Carolina twice in the last 4 years, but I could be wrong.
That doesn't work - just ask Texas. No way this happens again.The next TV vendor will contract with the top 50 teams and require they only play each other. The vendor will pay each team $150m
The next TV vendor will contract with the top 50 teams and require they only play each other. The vendor will pay each team $150m
Obvious troll is obviousThe next TV vendor will contract with the top 50 teams and require they only play each other. The vendor will pay each team $150m
Even so, they will follow a proven model. The single team model is proven - it is a proven failure.There will be new bidders with deep pockets that will change the paradigm of college football. The disrupters are amazon, Netflix and google.
Sounds like the PAC 12. I think it is a bad idea.It’s time for the SEC to think outside the box with each team playing 12 SEC games each season. The SEC has a built in monopoly of football rivalry so there’s no need to share the revenue.
When the rest of the power five adopts this strategy then the season becomes a playoff so we eliminate the need to expand the playoff system to more than four teams.
The SEC needs to demonstrate this proof of concept before the current TV contract expires. The next TV vendor ( google, amazon, netflix) will triple revenue by focusing on intra conference games of the top 50 teams