That actually helps Alabama, as Tua won't be running the way that Murray does. One less guy in coverage = receivers running even more open that nomal.We are going to spy Tua and according to BigTide, that will be the difference
That actually helps Alabama, as Tua won't be running the way that Murray does. One less guy in coverage = receivers running even more open that nomal.We are going to spy Tua and according to BigTide, that will be the difference
Good post, but Alabama can bring extra people as long as it is well disguised - same goes for OU. I have no idea what Alabama will do there. That is what is so tough about this defense - They rush 3-5 people, and it is almost impossible to figure out before the ball is snapped. OU also does a pretty good job disguising their corner blitzes.A spy only works as part of the entire 11 man D and its effectiveness. The idea is to score. If KM runs for say only 40 yards but throws for 370 and the result is 7-8 TD's who cares whether he is contained or not. The key is whether Alabama can get pressure from their 4 down w/o blitzing. If they can It will be a long day for OU. If they cant we are looking at a shootout. The other thing is RZ D. If the Tide can hold us to FG's that will help. Oh, and I was being facetious about spying Tua. I don't think such a scheme will be effective for either team.
This got me thinking for a moment. I wonder if Bama will try and flush Murray out of his pocket... use the DT and use one edge rusher to force him to run to the left side of the field, get him to throw ball across his body. It would make him less effective throwing cross the body. Or maybe use DT to rush, and get him feeling uncomfortable.Good post, but Alabama can bring extra people as long as it is well disguised - same goes for OU. I have no idea what Alabama will do there. That is what is so tough about this defense - They rush 3-5 people, and it is almost impossible to figure out before the ball is snapped. OU also does a pretty good job disguising their corner blitzes.
I like our chances with our linemen. We have good edge rushers and very good right up the middle rushers. If they can "affect" the QB without having to blitz a lot we will be fine. I think we can do that. I think we can dominate the line of scrimmage on both offense and defense. We just need to limit the mental errors on both sides of the ball.This got me thinking for a moment. I wonder if Bama will try and flush Murray out of his pocket... use the DT and use one edge rusher to force him to run to the left side of the field, get him to throw ball across his body. It would make him less effective throwing cross the body. Or maybe use DT to rush, and get him feeling uncomfortable.
If you flush him, you have to have a plan to tackle him. IMO, his legs are the difference maker. So, you don't flush him.This got me thinking for a moment. I wonder if Bama will try and flush Murray out of his pocket... use the DT and use one edge rusher to force him to run to the left side of the field, get him to throw ball across his body. It would make him less effective throwing cross the body. Or maybe use DT to rush, and get him feeling uncomfortable.
It is going to be very interesting in terms of the defensive scheme that the brain trust comes up with. Murray is much like Maziel in terms of breaking contain in the pocket and making those improvisational throws. He doesn't have a great arm and often throws of his back foot. IMO he isn't going to make many great throws to the wide outs with the athletes Bama has in coverage. The damage will be done with him getting outside and flipping the ball to a back or to a tight end or him running QB draws back though the middle which will lead to first downs. It requires a clean sheet of paper approach to combat this type of offense.If you flush him, you have to have a plan to tackle him. IMO, his legs are the difference maker. So, you don't flush him.
Nope. They may have some limited success on the edges. Dylan Moses will have to play a good game. Our dime package still has a lot of secondary players who can tackle.It is going to be very interesting in terms of the defensive scheme that the brain trust comes up with. Murray is much like Maziel in terms of breaking contain in the pocket and making those improvisational throws. He doesn't have a great arm and often throws of his back foot. IMO he isn't going to make many great throws to the wide outs with the athletes Bama has in coverage. The damage will be done with him getting outside and flipping the ball to a back or to a tight end or him running QB draws back though the middle which will lead to first downs. It requires a clean sheet of paper approach to combat this type of offense.
Question: Do we believe Oklahoma can run it well enough in a normal set to force Alabama out of a dime package? Taking it as a given that having more speed on defense would be a plus!
I understand it's a risk to do that, but I was just wondering if we gamble and see if he can make throws but then again, the Arkansas game gave me nightmare... we left lanes wide open, didn't tackle well in that game.If you flush him, you have to have a plan to tackle him. IMO, his legs are the difference maker. So, you don't flush him.
I don't think it's a gamble we want to take. Smart said they intended to flush Jalen, but that, when they did, he hurt them with his legs...I understand it's a risk to do that, but I was just wondering if we gamble and see if he can make throws but then again, the Arkansas game gave me nightmare... we left lanes wide open, didn't tackle well in that game.
I don't think that's it at all - I think you're seeing a reaction to the idea that you continue to put forth that Murray and this offense are the most unstoppable, mind-bending things ever seen in sports.
It's as if you think Bama isn't top-to-bottom loaded with sick talent.
It's not arrogance or smugness here, it's a reaction to someone coming along and acting as if half a team can beat a whole team.
Yes, OU has a chance, but the books have them as 2 TD dogs for a reason.
Both are good groups, but the LB's get bogged down in the middle at times and we have a frosh at one corner since Diggs was injured. Other than that both are pretty solid.Question...from everything I've read from neutral observers this edition of Tide D is not as good as recent past D's and generally the back 7 are referenced as the culprits. I have not watched Tide football enough to make pass judgement on these opinions. How do folks herein feel about your lb's and secondary?
The Bama secondary had to be replaced in total this year. Very talented but not a lot of experience. They have a whole season of experience now. I don't believe we are as dominant in our LB play this year - but they are still very good. In my opinion, most of our mistakes have been mental errors. Bama plays very sophisticated defensive schemes. It requires great communication and mental focus. Sometimes, like with GA, our players have to adjust to what the offense is doing. Usually, when we see formations and plays that are out of the norm of what the team usually plays. Our DC will adjust at half-time and usually this allows our Defense to shut teams down. Do not overlook the talent that resides on both sides of the ball with Bama. These are top notch athletes that with experience just gets better. Also, IMO - Bama doesn't just play defense to stop teams from scoring. The intent is to dominate and shut down the opponent. We all know how talented OU's QB is. OU has an explosive offense. But Bama has the best defense OU will see this year.Question...from everything I've read from neutral observers this edition of Tide D is not as good as recent past D's and generally the back 7 are referenced as the culprits. I have not watched Tide football enough to make pass judgement on these opinions. How do folks herein feel about your lb's and secondary?
I can only echo what the others have said. The secondary has really come along. They may be a shade below last year's, which was led by Minkah Fitzpatrick, the #11 pick in the draft. Three of the DBs were drafted in all, so it was retool from the ground up. Now, they're doing well. The weakest spot, as the others have said, is ILB and that's exactly where I expect CLR to attack...Question...from everything I've read from neutral observers this edition of Tide D is not as good as recent past D's and generally the back 7 are referenced as the culprits. I have not watched Tide football enough to make pass judgement on these opinions. How do folks herein feel about your lb's and secondary?