News Article: The balkanization of America...

bama_wayne1

All-American
Jun 15, 2007
2,700
16
57
Wasn't the current legislature and governor duly elected. That is the very definition of democracy elected representatives writing laws. There is nothing they can do to make that law permanent or irrevocable is there? The next group of duly elected people can pass laws to countermand this one. I don't see a problem. I am more worried about executive orders in our federal government by any party. That is a threat to democracy.
 

Crimson1967

Hall of Fame
Nov 22, 2011
18,759
9,951
187
Nice to see you're reading Mises.

The Founders, in my view are not the men who assembled in Philadelphia to declare independence or those men who assembled to draft a constitution, but the peoples of the several state conventions that ratified the proposed constitution where, to quote Madison, "it received all the authority which it possesses."

The Vox author directly states that Republicans in Wisconsin are "attacking democracy," they are "nullifying the results of the 2018 election."

That is just a silly, hyperbolic argument. The current legislature of the state was elected, were they not? And they passed a bill. The next legislature can repeal that bill. Simple solution.

Lefties tend (in my view) to want to place way too much emphasis on the executive of the system (which I find kind of odd, given their professed belief in "democracy," but whatever). At the beginning of the republic, the executive could do nothing but what the legislative branch authorized him to do. In fact, the Whigs, in 1840 I believe, ran on a platform that the president would not veto any bill passed by the legislature, because such a bill had been approved by the more popular branches of the government. This imperial presidency, an executive no longer bound by bills passed by the legislature, is a twentieth century idea, put forth by Teddy Roosevelt and Woodie Wilson (and most presidents since).
[Puts on tin foil hat(if tin foil existed in 1840)]

And look what happened to the Whig president after the election. Dead in a month. Pneumonia? Yeah, that’s what they want you to believe.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

UAH

All-American
Nov 27, 2017
3,609
4,160
187
As for Cheeseheads electing a Democratic legislature (and yes, I have been to Wisconsin), that problem was solved by gerrymandering. Maybe you shouldn’t be calling others disingenuous.
I lived in Ripon, Wi. one of the birth places of the Republican Party for nearly two decades.
Rural Wisconsinites would generally be moderate Republicans throughout the state. Madison is reminiscent of a European community with the associated somewhat liberal bias. Milwaukee is the only city with a significant minority population.
I say moderate Republicans because Robert La Follette a progressive Republican led a agenda of improving education and public services that exists largely there today. The public educational system generally works very well throughout the state, teacher are among the highest paid in the US. A high school graduate can expect to enter the University of Wisconsin system and receive a still affordable education that would rank with the Ivy League.

State income taxes are in the 10% of income range but the quality of public education, health care, roads and community makes it a worthwhile investment.

Scott Walker and the strain of Trump Republicans who attempt to distort the one man one vote that has held Wisconsin in good stead for a century are at the core of the issue now.
 

Chukker Veteran

Hall of Fame
Feb 6, 2001
10,608
5,098
287
But Falwell must like and approve of Hugh Freeze. I'm guessing if Hugh called a gay escort, Liberty wouldn't have hired him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's the first time I've seen Freeze went to Liberty. What a perfect place for him. He can now see as many hookers as he wants, those evangelicals have evidently decided personal immorality doesn't matter any more.
 

Tidewater

Hall of Fame
Mar 15, 2003
22,463
13,297
287
Hooterville, Vir.
As for Cheeseheads electing a Democratic legislature (and yes, I have been to Wisconsin), that problem was solved by gerrymandering. Maybe you shouldn’t be calling others disingenuous.
I do not believe I called anyone disingenuous. jthomas666 called me disingenuous.
 

Tidewater

Hall of Fame
Mar 15, 2003
22,463
13,297
287
Hooterville, Vir.
I am not sure "balkanization" is the right term. Wikipedia defines "balkanization" this way: "Balkanization, is a geopolitical term for the process of fragmentation or division of a region or state into smaller regions or states that are often hostile or uncooperative with one another."

Maybe "tribalization" is more accurate.
 

jthomas666

Hall of Fame
Aug 14, 2002
22,673
9,877
287
60
Birmingham & Warner Robins
So if they adopted the exact same bill the day the new legislature took office, you'd be okay with it? Maybe the Democrats should try harder and win the majority of the next legislature.
I'd mainly be amused, as it's rather unlikely the new governor would sign the bill.
Of course they are. So?
Ah, so you're OK with naked power grabs, so long as they're legal power grabs.

If, as the Vox author would have us believe, the issues of the governor's "ability to change state welfare policy and withdraw from a lawsuit against the Affordable Care Act" were the only issues that mattered (and those issues resulted in the Democrat winning the governor's office, why did the good people of Wisconsin elect a Republican-majority legislature?
So. Much. Derp.

First, your question is pointless, given that when the people voted, the governor had the authority to enact the proposals he was running on.

Secondly, the article never says, nor does it imply, that welfare policy and ACA were the only issues that mattered (Hello, Mister Strawman!); it points out that those were two key issues that the new governor ran on. In addition, the Wisconsin speaker of the house explicitly said that the bill was intended to keep the new governor from enacting liberal policies. Or, as Vox put it, the bill is "an explicit effort to weaken Democrats and prevent the new governor from doing what he was elected to do. [emphasis added]"

Finally, the suggestion that Wisconsin should have elected a democratic legislature is somewhat problematic, because the GOP is very good at gerrymandering, in Wisconsin and in the rest of the nation.
 

twofbyc

Hall of Fame
Oct 14, 2009
12,222
3,371
187
I do not believe I called anyone disingenuous. jthomas666 called me disingenuous.
Apologies. Misread that multi- quote.
But it’s not being totally honest just saying they should just elect a Democratic legislature, for reason stated.
I spent time in Monroe (not far from Paul Ryan’s hometown) and those union people used to be Democrats. I know more than a few who still are. They viewed Reagan as a union-buster and still don’t trust Republicans.
Walker lost because the WHOLE state (not just gerrymandered districts) voted.
I could go on and on about ALEC and their subversive behavior and how they all should be hung, but that’s another topic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Tidewater

Hall of Fame
Mar 15, 2003
22,463
13,297
287
Hooterville, Vir.
I'd mainly be amused, as it's rather unlikely the new governor would sign the bill.
Ah, so you're OK with naked power grabs, so long as they're legal power grabs.
I do not think they are "attacks on democracy."
So. Much. Derp.
I don't even know that that means, but I'm sensing a bit of anger, with a helping of ad hominem.
First, your question is pointless, given that when the people voted, the governor had the authority to enact the proposals he was running on.

Secondly, the article never says, nor does it imply, that welfare policy and ACA were the only issues that mattered (Hello, Mister Strawman!); it points out that those were two key issues that the new governor ran on. In addition, the Wisconsin speaker of the house explicitly said that the bill was intended to keep the new governor from enacting liberal policies. Or, as Vox put it, the bill is "an explicit effort to weaken Democrats and prevent the new governor from doing what he was elected to do. [emphasis added]"
Maybe the Republican majority in the legislature was elected to prevent the governor from doing what he wants to do.
Finally, the suggestion that Wisconsin should have elected a democratic legislature is somewhat problematic, because the GOP is very good at gerrymandering, in Wisconsin and in the rest of the nation.
Would you say Democrats do not gerrymander?
 

jthomas666

Hall of Fame
Aug 14, 2002
22,673
9,877
287
60
Birmingham & Warner Robins
I do not think they are "attacks on democracy."
what about naked power grabs, as that's the phrase I actually used?
I don't even know that that means, but I'm sensing a bit of anger, with a helping of ad hominem.

Maybe the Republican majority in the legislature was elected to prevent the governor from doing what he was elected to do.
fixed to highlight the silliness of your suggestion.

Would you say Democrats do not gerrymander?
No, I would not.
 

Tidewater

Hall of Fame
Mar 15, 2003
22,463
13,297
287
Hooterville, Vir.
what about naked power grabs, as that's the phrase I actually used?
"Naked" I assume you mean "obvious" or "undisguised." Would surreptitious have been better? A lame duck session to enact a law to prevent the incoming governor from acting is almost certainly unethical. Are you accusing politicians of acting unethically?
I don't even know that that means, but I'm sensing a bit of anger, with a helping of ad hominem.
I'm not sure there is a point to be made here, but you do seem quite angry.
fixed to highlight the silliness of your suggestion.
I would say rephrasing what someone said to ridicule it is a sure sign of a defeated wit.
No, I would not.
How Democrats Gerrymandered Their Way to Victory in Maryland
Mother Jones produced a map of the gerrymandered districts.

The people in far western Maryland have little culturally in common with people in the DC suburbs who are reliably Democratic.
Mother Jones described the gerrymandering this way:
Democrats added a strange-looking appendage to the district, reaching all the way down into the affluent Washington, DC, suburbs to scoop up Democratic voters. More than 360,000 people were moved out of the district, and nearly as many were moved in. It went from solidly Republican to reliably Democratic; the Cook Political Report identified it as the biggest district swing in the country.
You surely trust that Mother Jones is not biased to the right.

I do not know why you are reacting so personally. You and I disagree on a political matter. I do not ascribe malign intent to that. You are not a bad person. In fact, I would credit your motivations to an attempt to care for the downtrodden and to help the less fortunate.
But you and I disagree, and that means a differences in facts, in reasoning, or in values. I find those differences interesting.
 
Last edited:

New Posts

Latest threads

TideFans.shop - NEW Stuff!

TideFans.shop - Get YOUR Bama Gear HERE!”></a>
<br />

<!--/ END TideFans.shop & item link \-->
<p style= Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.