I would throw out the Notre Dame game from a Clemson D perspective. Under Kelly Notre Dame often has a quality OL but this was not one of their stronger units. This was a physical mismatch up front. Maybe if they could bring back the 2017 OL for this game then it could've been a contest. It was telling that in a big moment (4th down in 2nd quarter) Clemson was more than happy to put a LB/S hybrid on ND's best WR Miles Boykin in the slot AND he was trailing him step for step on a slot fade concept THEN defended the pass! This was an across the board mismatch and games like this are for the partisans to make youtube highlight reels not for analysis.
The Lawrence suspension was no big deal versus Notre Dame but I believe it looms large for this matchup. Clemson's DBs have been burned a bunch this season. Venables likes to load the box up and work line games and stunts to isolate his rushers in one on ones. He'll leave his DBs on islands, force you to pass, and bet he'll make you throw it away or take a sack before they get burned. Unsurprisingly, the best job we've done against their defense was in 2015 when Coker was playing his best ball late in the season. 2016 and 2017 were noted struggles for passing game consistency and accordingly Venables did a pretty good job of giving his offense a chance to win (31 and 24 points). Because of Lawrence being out we will run well enough to force Venables to stay true to his scheme and load up the box. If we can block up those blitzes then we're gonna get explosive plays. This game hinges on Tua's ankle/knee being 100% because we're gonna need some extension/secondary offense at times.
I think Notre Dame did show some positive things for us w/r/t to Clemson's offense. Until they started having back seven guys drop out of the game, they were frustrating Lawrence a bit. Other than one complete front bust that led to an Etienne long TD run, Clemson was mostly contained on the ground. They're still not quite blueblood level on the offensive front for whatever reason. Good but not great would be my prognosis. Notre Dame's lacking depth on defense really became the sticking point as Clemson harassed the replacements due to injuries for several long TD throws. Notre Dame did a poor job with Renfrow on 1st/3rd downs too. It is hard to cover him because they do a good job of moving him around to matchup on backers if you're zoning and leveraging option routes if you just stick a nickel corner on him in man coverage. Confusing Lawrence and getting deflections at the LOS seems to be the key for defending these possession throws.
The key for this game is how we matchup with their 11 personnel (1 RB, 1 TE/H-B, 3 WR). This is their preferred base personnel grouping to operate out of for runs or passes. If we can contain their run with 6 as we have in each matchup thus far then mix coverages on Lawrence then I think we can force him into bad throws assuming we can collapse the pocket on him. He's a good runner but he's not Kyler Murray. He'll probably bust us on a scramble a few times but I don't see 111 yards rushing in his future.
My early prediction is Alabama 35 Clemson 20. I think Tua throws for 4 TDs again. Most of them will probably be long throws. His completion percentage will be about his average but we have a few drives killed by sacks or holds forced by their DL. We run for about 150 yards as a team. Jacobs and N. Harris are the top performers though neither has a big game by yardage.
Clemson made the smart move to Lawrence with this game in mind but I think Saban's noted success against Freshmen quarterbacks will continue next week. He'll play well but have a few 3rd downs where he doesn't make a good throw and maybe a huge turnover that results in a score.