Eh, the pearl clutching media will write one of these for any coaching termination where the coach in question is remotely likable and the program isn't a fully-involved structure fire. We took our lumps after terminating Shula. They're usually wrong. I think this guy is wrong too. Applewhite was a failure. He took over a team that has power conference talent - at least amongst the first string - in a weak conference but he's averaged an 8-5 record in two seasons. Holgs is going to do very well in Houston. He will maximize their talent on offense and surprisingly WVU was never quite OU awful on defense either. This will get them back on the trajectory Herman, Sumlin, and Briles had them on. Again, the writer likes to point out that Applewhite was beating Houston's historical winning percentage. But how does he compare to the last decade of Houston football? I don't even have the numbers and I'm sure it is unfavorable.