Well, I really hope I am wrong and made some mistakes with my calculations. I always do them 4 different ways, then average those results. Sometimes, I get pretty close (I called the SECCG at 35-27) and other times I miss by a mile (I choose to forget those). But with my calculations, it could actually go either way (one of the methods actually had Clemson winning the game 34-30). The narrowest margin I got was in the neighborhood of .08 points with Bama ahead. The widest margin was near 8 points for Bama. The game won't be played on my spreadsheet though, so who knows?
"Sometimes, I get pretty close (I called the SECCG at 35-27) and other times I miss by a mile (I choose to forget those)"...You should be a weather forecaster.
Georgia had nothing to play for, against Texas, and had no motivation. Kind of like Bama, after losing to Auburn in 2013. Bama then played uninspired football against Oklahoma in the Sugar Bowl, and lost. Bama got Georgia's full attention in the 2018 SECCG. The Georgia team Bama beat was a different team that Texas beat.
When I did the stats on the game, I was shocked at how equal everything was. The averages point to a one point game.
but if they're suspended, they're suspended, right?
Our senior class is currently 55-3 which is the most wins by a senior class beating our own record. Clemson's senior class is 54-4 so if they beat us their senior class will tie our record. Hoping we have the record late Monday night.
if Bama scores 35 and your O-line plays well, then logically Bama would score more than 35 if your O-line doesn't play well because Bama would likely get more possessions/better field position, etc.
ok, that makes more sense.
ok, that makes more sense.
It's very unlikely they will find the source if it was salt like they were suspecting then it's probably already been used. If it has something to do with a cream or something that was used for the injuries then it's already gone as well. There is like a 2% chance they will be back and that's pushing it. Hate it turned out that way for them because I don't believe they intentionally took anything but it is what it is. Don't know why they are allowing it to be produced at the rate that it is considering it's a banned substance. Athaletes shouldn't have to worry about contaminated products.
