It did. And he was elected...So....the sales management person in me has to ask......
With all the money involved in politics......how in the world does a political party not provide a candidate who energizes the voter?
It did. And he was elected...So....the sales management person in me has to ask......
With all the money involved in politics......how in the world does a political party not provide a candidate who energizes the voter?
It did. And he was elected...
I don’t. Many people I know who voted for him don’t care about the wall and never did. Some still support him, some don’t.You are overlooking something - the man won the EC by only 77K votes. You don't think he could lose that many of his base, if he doesn't deliver a wall of some kind? I think he's absolutely correct...
He will still energize and turn out his 38-42%. Frankly, I don't think even the wall failure and shutdown will wound him seriously enough for his defeat, although I think he's smart to be wary of it, given the tiny margin of EC victory. I still believe that he will lose a lot of independents and voters who wanted "shake things up." Also, because of the general negativity surrounding HC, the people with the most to lose with a Trump presidency, the black and brown people, stayed home in droves. The question is whether or not the Democrats can turn out such a candidate. All they have to do is quit the foot-shooting...Well played.
But I was talking about for 2020.....
Incumbency is a powerful tool. Also, even though the economy is being pumped up with what are normally recession-fighting tools, if the chickens come home to roost before 2020, his goose is cooked...I don’t. Many people I know who voted for him don’t care about the wall and never did. Some still support him, some don’t.
Wall or no wall, he won’t get re-elected; highly doubtful he’ll even be able to run.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A microcosm of what might happen is how Doug Jones got elected. One unfit candidate (Moore) and another who had a drastically different worldview (Jones). So many Republicans stayed home to a large percentage, especially in the Birmingham metro area. Thus, Jones wins. I can see that happening on a national scale in 2020.It will suffice if they become apathetic and just stay home. That's exactly how he got elected...
I understand your position, and realize my opinion is biased - but when has either party ever been about anything other than money and power?I would like to think the report from Mueller, showing Trump basically IS a Russian puppet, would sway his base against him, but at the same time, I realize the GOP has abandoned any sense of patriotism, and is ok with Trump teaming up with Putin to win.
Would love to hear more about the last part of your post. Are you referring to how the HC campaign 'performed'? And specifically - how the DNC handled themselves in 2016?He will still energize and turn out his 38-42%. Frankly, I don't think even the wall failure and shutdown will wound him seriously enough for his defeat, although I think he's smart to be wary of it, given the tiny margin of EC victory. I still believe that he will lose a lot of independents and voters who wanted "shake things up." Also, because of the general negativity surrounding HC, the people with the most to lose with a Trump presidency, the black and brown people, stayed home in droves. The question is whether or not the Democrats can turn out such a candidate. All they have to do is quit the foot-shooting...
Mueller might bring the heat long before 2020....Incumbency is a powerful tool. Also, even though the economy is being pumped up with what are normally recession-fighting tools, if the chickens come home to roost before 2020, his goose is cooked...
When John Kerry was offered help under the table by one of our country's adversaries, he went straight to the FBI. When Trump was offered help from the Russians, he took advantage. Now we know Trump lied throughout his entire campaign about not working with the Russians, and was instead negotiating with them about building a Trump tower in Moscow that would put hundreds of million dollars in his pocket. In exchange for relaxing sanctions against Russian interests, which he has lobbied for in a very public fashion, evidently assuming his base is either too dumb, uninformed or racist for it to make any difference. So far, it looks like he knew his voters very well.I understand your position, and realize my opinion is biased - but when has either party ever been about anything other than money and power?
I understand your position, and realize my opinion is biased - but when has either party ever been about anything other than money and power?
Yeah, I don't agree with universal cynicism here. There were many Democrats who voted for the ACA knowing it would end their political career. And it did, although history seems to have vindicated their choice. McCain could have let that racist woman tell lies about Obama's heritage during his town hall. As we see now with Trump, that would have surely helped his campaign. But he didn't.When John Kerry was offered help under the table by one of our country's adversaries, he went straight to the FBI. When Trump was offered help from the Russians, he took advantage.
You can make any argument you want for or against any politician.When John Kerry was offered help under the table by one of our country's adversaries, he went straight to the FBI. When Trump was offered help from the Russians, he took advantage. Now we know Trump lied throughout his entire campaign about not working with the Russians, and was instead negotiating with them about building a Trump tower in Moscow that would put hundreds of million dollars in his pocket. In exchange for relaxing sanctions against Russian interests, which he has lobbied for in a very public fashion, evidently assuming his base is either too dumb, uninformed or racist for it to make any difference. So far, it looks like he knew his voters very well.
the cynicism is necessary to create the both sides facade.Yeah, I don't agree with universal cynicism here. There were many Democrats who voted for the ACA knowing it would end their political career. And it did, although history seems to have vindicated their choice. McCain could have let that racist woman tell lies about Obama's heritage during his town hall. As we see now with Trump, that would have surely helped his campaign. But he didn't.
Just because the current GOP is avoiding their constitutional duties through love of power and money does not mean this has always been the case.
I've so revolted by the GOP that I vote Dem by default. That doesn't mean the Dems have blanket approval from me. We've seen corrupt Dems from time to time, out for personal gain rather than the public good. But what we are seeing now is an entire party becoming Russian friendly because they are following their leader, with many other elected GOPers bought and paid for by Russian money laundered through the NRA or other avenues that can't be tracked, and are also funded by Putin's cronies.Yeah, I don't agree with universal cynicism here. There were many Democrats who voted for the ACA knowing it would end their political career. And it did, although history seems to have vindicated their choice. McCain could have let that racist woman tell lies about Obama's heritage during his town hall. As we see now with Trump, that would have surely helped his campaign. But he didn't.
Just because the current GOP is avoiding their constitutional duties through love of power and money does not mean this has always been the case.
Yes, and also avoid the kind of internecine attacks which occurred during the last Republican primaries and greatly benefited Trump. I'd say his running in '20 is about 50%...Would love to hear more about the last part of your post. Are you referring to how the HC campaign 'performed'? And specifically - how the DNC handled themselves in 2016?
Also - I don't think Trump will run in 2020....especially the way things are looking with the Mueller investigation.
Asking the other GOP candidates how they like the idea that Trump beat them in the primaries using extra help from the Russians leaves them stammering for a response. I seem to remember Rubio and Graham both being asked about it.Yes, and also avoid the kind of internecine attacks which occurred during the last Republican primaries and greatly benefited Trump. I'd say his running in '20 is about 50%...
My 91 year old Mom's doctor shifted his approach from a curative to a palliative one this past Friday following a very difficult few weeks. The palliative method is the prerequisite required to get Hospice involved. She's still living at home and wants to finish up there, no idea what kind of time frame we are looking at.Thank you, NT17. I know you have your hands full as well. Our Mom's are lucky they have their children standing by in their time of need. It truly is a calling.
All the best to your Mom, sir....and to you and yours.
My 91 year old Mom's doctor shifted his approach from a curative to a palliative one this past Friday following a very difficult few weeks. The palliative method is the prerequisite required to get Hospice involved. She's still living at home and wants to finish up there, no idea what kind of time frame we are looking at.
My best to NT17 and Bazza and your mothers.