Although there's overlap, I think they're two different groups. There is a large group of independents, among whom I count myself. I contributed to three campaigns - and displayed yard signs - for two Republicans and one Democrat, this past year. However, when it comes to Trump, I'm far from undecided, as anyone who's followed my posting here can see. 2020, IMO, will be decided mainly by two factors. For one, how many independents will vote again for Trump. Obviously, he didn't win solely with his base; not enough of them. Independents voted in droves for "change," disaffection with politicians, etc. At this point, I think he's lost most of them, and he losing more every day with the shutdown. To some degree, this is offset by the power of incumbency. The other factor is whether or not the Democratic nominee is attractive enough to motivate that base, particularly minorities, which didn't happen in 2016.I see posts about “undecided” voters; undecided about what?
Voters aren’t undecided about Trump; not from any poll I’ve seen, in any number that isn’t almost totally insignificant.
I don’t think they’re undecided about anything right now; “divided” , maybe.
Republicans own this hostage taking, McConnell has shown he’s been neutered by Trump, Dems are still floundering around trying to see how they can come out ahead on this...while Rome burns.
Maybe substituting “ Independent “ for undecided might be more accurate, since those numbers are growing and the partisan bases of both parties seem to be firmly entrenched.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Further, I think that, if Trump loses, it will be because he failed to govern more from the center. It's time-honored in politics to do that. Your base will grit their collective teeth and vote for you. He has governed solely for his base. It will be interesting to see if it works. It may, if the shutdown doesn't do too much damage, like tip us into a recession, when combined with his 19th century economics, and the economy can stay artificially pumped-up until 2020...