I’m not a rules expert so somebody on here may have to sort this question out, but this is just a thought:
We all saw the success on the recruiting trail by bringing in a younger staff and that also could have been the reason we lost the NCG due to the sacrifice of youth over more experienced coaches.
By NCAA rules, we’re allowed so many on-field and (I’m assuming) off-field positions. How many of those off the field positions are allowed to recruit? Would it be risky to consider shifting some of the recruiting weight to a few of those off the field coaches to help with allowing some key positions coaches to focus solely on the players?
Would the NCAA even allow this?
If they did, wouldn’t you think that could be a new trend in CFB or am I just thinking of something that is already in place?
We all saw the success on the recruiting trail by bringing in a younger staff and that also could have been the reason we lost the NCG due to the sacrifice of youth over more experienced coaches.
By NCAA rules, we’re allowed so many on-field and (I’m assuming) off-field positions. How many of those off the field positions are allowed to recruit? Would it be risky to consider shifting some of the recruiting weight to a few of those off the field coaches to help with allowing some key positions coaches to focus solely on the players?
Would the NCAA even allow this?
If they did, wouldn’t you think that could be a new trend in CFB or am I just thinking of something that is already in place?