A lot of hyperbole, overreaction, and just plain wide spread panic have gone on since the Clemson game. To hear people say it, our OL and DL and the whole defense sucked all year, but a week before that game, our defense (and horrible defensive coaches, for that matter) put together a first half performance for the ages against the best offense in the country. They slacked off in the 2nd half, but losing Christian Miller and their intensity played into as much as anything. I really believe our team played OU like it was the NC game. I truly do. Murray winning the stupid Hypesman channeled our their focus on unto proving Tua had "his" trophy robbed away. Our problem this year was about an attitude, mentality, and key injuries more than anything. It was the perfect storm.
Our biggest problem with personnel was lack of depth, but the question is why? That's why I think we are seeing so much staff turnover. I have heard from a former player still close to the current players say that Wynn and Barmore were studs in practice, but never saw the field. My question is why is that? Saving or redshirting players is basically a thing of the past in our program. Q is proof of that. Besides people who follow recruiting or follow the program really closely had never heard his name until this year. Now he's gone as a RS Soph 1 year starter. Jobe actually looked good in relief of Savion in the NCG, but he would have seen the field if not for Savion's "injury". I feel like these young guys should have some kind of limited role early and often and should developed in games through the season. An early enrollee has been on campus by game 15 in the season as long as players in the past were by nearly the end of their Soph year. If we are only going to have a lot of players 3 years, I think their clock needs to start earlier than players past.