https://www.dailywire.com/news/4305...ook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
What say you? Yes, No, Maybe?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What say you? Yes, No, Maybe?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Screwball. I guess he's trying to equate "left" to the progressive wing of the Democratic party. If you want to see what definition has really changed, it's the definition of "conservative"...https://www.dailywire.com/news/4305...ook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
What say you? Yes, No, Maybe?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I stopped to go get a big grain of salt when I saw it was from Prager University.Screwball. I guess he's trying to equate "left" to the progressive wing of the Democratic party. If you want to see what definition has really changed, it's the definition of "conservative"...
Exactly. Every example of the far left he gives I could give a counterexample of the far right. The clean air example. He is certainly right that there are those in the conservative spectrum that want clean air and just disagree with the left on how to achieve clean air/environment. What he fails to mention is that there are some right wingnuts that just refuse to admit that man is even having an impact on the climate.Both the far left and the far right are nutbags.
Remove the political labels and apply personality types and you'll find they are actually cut from the same cloth. The far right/left political nut job is also a person who more than likely is an extremist in other non political parts of their life. Whatever they grab a hold of they go to the extremes with.Both the far left and the far right are nutbags.
Daily Wire opinion piece with a transparent agenda? I am aghast.It really matters of what you define "liberal". I think not all "liberals" are left, but all are probably not to the right. I think the common term associated with American Liberals in the modern day is far different from what Jefferson was.
But what I think they are trying to get at in this article is a difference between a neo-liberal democrat and a regressive left liberal. Which yes there is a difference, but there is a difference between a neo-LIBERAL conservative and a trumper. So I'm really trying to see what the author's goal is other than to say "The looney left is the majority of the Democratic Party so you neo libs need to come to the "sane" side of the aisle because we share common goals".
Interesting.Daily Wire opinion piece with a transparent agenda? I am aghast.
I think Charmin was just saying the source isn’t exactly defining the terms for educational purposes but rather for propaganda. I don’t think it was addressing your definition.Interesting.
I defined the terms above. Do you dispute the definitions? If so, how?
If you accept the definitions, do you see any daylight between the definition of a "liberal" and a "leftist?"
What 81 said.Interesting.
I defined the terms above. Do you dispute the definitions? If so, how?
If you accept the definitions, do you see any daylight between the definition of a "liberal" and a "leftist?"
Okay, so do you dispute the definitions I provided? (I do not consider myself a leftist and nor would most liberal find much solidarity with my views.)What 81 said.
I think you are defining "liberal" as a classical liberal, and left as the far left of American and British politics. The problem is that excludes folks like the Clintons and Obamas who are neo liberals, and not Sanders and Corben "progressives". Point is there is a difference between the average CNN viewers and the average TYT viewers, and this article acts like the latter is the majority of the party which is false.Okay, so do you dispute the definitions I provided? (I do not consider myself a leftist and nor would most liberal find much solidarity with my views.)
If you accept the definitions, do you see any difference between the definitions of "leftist" and "liberal?"
Thanks, but I think you are attributing to me the views of the guy in the opening post.I think you are defining "liberal" as a classical liberal, and left as the far left of American and British politics. The problem is that excludes folks like the Clintons and Obamas who are neo liberals, and not Sanders and Corben "progressives". Point is there is a difference between the average CNN viewers and the average TYT viewers, and this article acts like the latter is the majority of the party which is false.