You are absolutely correct. Nothing has changed and will never change in Oxford. In recent Ole Miss football news:What should the consequences be for using ineligible players? When the consequences are prospective, like bowl bans or scholarship limitations, people complain (with some accuracy) that the NCAA is punishing players who weren't there when it happened. If the consequences are retrospective (like vacations of victories or titles), then people complain that they are meaningless. Do we really want to say that anything goes?
Obviously, the attitude of Ole Miss is to not show any contrition for admitted rules violation, which causes me to wonder if anything has changed.
https://www.clarionledger.com/story...-defensive-coordinator-tyrone-nix/2905665002/
The reason we should be rolling laughing is that Nix was named in the ACT scam that was the most penalized infraction. Nix was Houston Nutt's DC at Ole Miss and was fired when Hugh Freeze took over. Ole Miss threw David Saunders and Chris Vaughn under the bus for the ACT fraud and shielded Nix only to rehire him 2 years later when they thought everyone would have forgotten about his involvement.