I understand the perspective Bazza. However, they have had the opportunity to “compete and get better” for 30+ games with little to no success. There are really two separate questions here: Is this team incapable of playing better/more consistent than they have? Certainly Then why over the course of these 30+ games haven’t they? Then, in my mind, it has to be either a) players aren’t coachable or b) coaches can’t teach .
I know where I fall on this. When you can’t inbound a ball, get your feet set on defense, block out on rebounds even in man to man defense, consistently have stretches in almost every game where you go scoreless for over five minutes or more in a half, give up double digit leads only to lose, and have your “foot in the opponent’s throat” and don’t finish them, then that is coaching. Period. We give CAJ 3 million reasons every year to make players better and the team better. And he hasn’t.
I understand the idea that the student athlete has the desire to “compete”. I question the desire of this coaching staff to help them compete better. The press conference with Avery after the Arkansas loss and Saturday after Kentucky game told me just about all I needed to see.
We are going to the NIT because of dollars, not desire by this staff or this team.
Just my opinion.