The same sort of people getting upset over the EXTREME POLITICS OF ESPN are the ones making or consuming defeminized edits of Star Wars and Avengers movies.
What are these movies that you are referring to? The last movie I went to was taking my niece to see the SpongeBobSquarePants movie. I think it was devoid of politics. (Although I gather some believe it is covertly sending some sort of nefarious message of some sort.)The same sort of people getting upset over the <font color="#0000FF">EXTREME POLITICS OF ESPN</font> are the ones making or consuming defeminized edits of Star Wars and Avengers movies.
It took a minute, but it finally showed on the bottom line. It was argued here that the falling subscriptions were from people simply cutting the cord all together, but there was enough of a migration away due to politics that the message was received at the top.Are we actually getting into the political motivations behind ESPN moving away from political commentary?
And the relative strengths and weaknesses of the minds possessed by individuals supporting the move as opposed to those against it?
ESPN's move, assuming it actually exists (I wouldn't know), makes no difference to me.
Unless there's a specific event, usually involving a team fielded by the University of Alabama, I quit watching long ago. Reason is I got tired of being called a cretin.
Your whole business model is predicated on charging me money so that Tim Brando and Keith Olbermann, and Jemelle Robinson and countless others can try to insult me into coming over to their point of view? On things that have, at best, a tangential relationship with sports?
Really?
Are you wanting this thread to get shipped to Non-Sports?Everything has a degree of politics in it. They'll never satisfy conservatives who don't want to have to confront realities they don't like even if they're not remarked upon by the broadcaster. In that sense, the "no politics" is in fact a political message because it amounts to nothing more than erasure of what simply exists.
I think that was the ad. I couldn't remember exactly but I think he said he worked out a deal with the gas stations that if they would not loan money, he would not sell gas.My dad tells a story about when he was in HS and worked for a local grocery store. The store manager would often have people come in and want to cash their paychecks. They had no intentions of buying groceries from them, but just wanted to cash their check. My dad said he can still remember hearing the store manager tell them, "I've made a deal with the banks around here. I'd stay out of the banking business and they wouldn't get into the grocery business. So if you want your checked cashed, go to a bank. If you want to buy groceries, there's a shopping cart." LOL!
I can't link it. But Bill Burr has a segment on the Conan O'Brien show that perfectly explains it. He absolutely nails my thoughts about the NFL, MLB or any other professional sport trying to address "causes" and 'issues" while we're watching sports. "Youtube it". LOL! It's great.Are you wanting this thread to get shipped to Non-Sports?
The desire to be able to watch a game or even commentary about said game without being preached to has absolutely nothing to with with an inability to face reality at all. It's because we just want to watch the damn game! Why is that difficult to grasp?
HUH?When you're doing superhero movies, there are only so many stories so you gotta do different types of heroes to shake it up and try to find markets that can be exploited for profits.
and here i thought you gave up on moving pictures when they introduced soundWhat are these movies that you are referring to? The last movie I went to was taking my niece to see the SpongeBobSquarePants movie. I think it was devoid of politics. (Although I gather some believe it is covertly sending some sort of nefarious message of some sort.)
OK..........it really is nap time now.
No doubt in my mind that when people are actually complaining about "too much politics" in their entertainment they're actually just identifying the cynical exploitation of identity in the name of profits. When you're doing superhero movies, there are only so many stories so you gotta do different types of heroes to shake it up and try to find markets that can be exploited for profits.
The cynical exploitation and politics on ESPN takes many shapes. Sometimes its the cancer/terminal illness kids. Sometimes it is the fact that they show every national anthem w/ military flyover. Sometimes it is talking about Colin Kaepernick.
My hat is off to you rgw. Seriously, I have re-read every one of your posts in this thread and I still don't have a clue as to what you mean. It is not often that someone can talk so far over by head that I am totally lost but you have done it. I graduated HS and college but I am not smart enough to understand what you are talking about. I am not in your league.No doubt in my mind that when people are actually complaining about "too much politics" in their entertainment they're actually just identifying the cynical exploitation of identity in the name of profits. When you're doing superhero movies, there are only so many stories so you gotta do different types of heroes to shake it up and try to find markets that can be exploited for profits.
The cynical exploitation and politics on ESPN takes many shapes. Sometimes its the cancer/terminal illness kids. Sometimes it is the fact that they show every national anthem w/ military flyover. Sometimes it is talking about Colin Kaepernick.
And that’s what many of the yungins are doing, YouTubing it. My son absolutely loves sports and doesn’t watch live TV. You watches clips on YouTube: game highlights, commentary, parodies about sports, etc.I can't link it. But Bill Burr has a segment on the Conan O'Brien show that perfectly explains it. He absolutely nails my thoughts about the NFL, MLB or any other professional sport trying to address "causes" and 'issues" while we're watching sports. "Youtube it". LOL! It's great.
This is where I'm at with ESPN shows. Not so much the commentary but it's the same show repeated throughout the day. I do like pro-sports but I find other ways to get analysis, updates, etc.I do not watch ESPN unless there is a good SEC football game on. I no longer watch Gameday or any of the other game day analysis (not because of political commentary) just has gotten old and repetitive. I would never watch the commentary shows since I have no interest in the NFL, NBA, MLB or the NHL. Those who watch all these ESPN shows run the risk of hearing political commentary. ESPN lost me as a viewer long before it decided to inject political opinions into their broadcast narrative.
Most of the personalities have zero knowledge of the actual game. Over the years they've picked up some of the coach's lingo and basically gotten what amounts to a fan's level honorary "degree" in the sport yet try to speak as an expert on it. Paul Finebaum, Stephen A Smith, Colin Cowherd, Skip Bayless are just a few of many of these types over the years.This is where I'm at with ESPN shows. Not so much the commentary but it's the same show repeated throughout the day. I do like pro-sports but I find other ways to get analysis, updates, etc.
That was not the intent to be sure. My point is that ESPN and other entertainment concerns use identity - LGBT people, military people, LGBT military people, militant LGBT people, etc, etc, etc - to entice consumption. It is all about the money. They are most certainly not going to stop being political because it is impossible to not be political to some degree. They're just going to stop being political in ways that upset what butters their bread. Football is a big part of their revenue and that audience skews conservative. If the MLB (usually a more centrist audience) and NBA (usually a more left audience) were their chief money makers then they'd probably invite Antifa and the Pod Save America crew to do halftime shows.My hat is off to you rgw. Seriously, I have re-read every one of your posts in this thread and I still don't have a clue as to what you mean. It is not often that someone can talk so far over by head that I am totally lost but you have done it. I graduated HS and college but I am not smart enough to understand what you are talking about. I am not in your league.
If we are being honest with one another then we need to recognize that this applies to those on both sides equally. People who feel strongly about anything tend to evangelize it. We see it every day on this board.Folks, of a certain political persuasion