A down year for an Alabama fan requires perspective.
Hell, 2010 was "down" year by our standards.
What a lot of people don't remember about 1984 is that we were considered serious contenders for the national championship before the season began. We had one first-place vote in the preseason AP poll, and we began at number nine after finishing 1983 at 15 following our shredding of SMU. Had we beaten Boston College in the opener - a ranked team with a Heisman Trophy candidate (and ultimately winner) at QB - then we would have jumped probably as high as 5 in the second poll of the season because of the losses in front of us.
We scored 31 points in the first half plus a kickoff return from Goode against BC. Not including the 37-14 thumping over ULL in week 3, we never topped 29 points in any game the rest of the year, two opponents held us to single digits, and two others held us to 14 points (we went 1-3 in those four contests). The shift of offense from the old wishbone of Bryant to Ray Perkins's pro set style worked (to a degree) in 1983, but sophomore Mike Shula was no Walter Lewis, and we didn't have the Joey Jones or Jesse Bendross receiver in 84 that we got even better with Al Bell in 1985. (We did have Whitehurst, Richardson, and Chandler a year better in 1985....so, too, Shula, who actually threw fewer passes in 1984 than the late Vince Sutton did).
The problem in 1984 is we just never got going. It was sort of like 2000 but without the Dubosian drama. I'll guarantee you that when Tide fans think of 1984 there is one first and ONLY memory they retain precious: the goal line stand that beat an Auburn team that was substantially better than us that year.
As far as 1997......I wasn't completely surprised because you need to go back and look at how many "thread the needle" contests we had when Stallings coached us. Here's how many one-score margin games we played:
1990 - 4 (3 losses)
1991 - 6 (0 losses)
1992 - 3 (0 losses)
1993 - 4 (2 losses, 1 tie)
1994 - 8 (1 loss)
1995 - 6 (2 losses)
1996 - 5 (2 losses)
The difference in the Stallings era and the DuBose era was NOT talent no matter how many folks want to say "but sanctions." After all, even DuBose won an SEC title WITH STALLINGS'S SENIORS!!!
The difference? In game coaching. Take a look at one-score games (e.g. 8 points or less)
1997 - 4 (4 losses)
1998 - 5 (1 loss)
1999 - 6 (2 losses)
Prior to 2000, Alabama played 19 one-score games under Stallings (and won 14) in his last three years; in Dubious's first three years, we played 15 more......and lost 7 (basically half of them).
Stallings 14-5
DuBose 8-7
So what happened the moment CGS recruits left (Alexander, Samuels, etc)?
2000 3 (3 losses)
And keep in mind that micro-analysis would show some of the "big wins" under DuBose really weren't (see 99 Miss St and 00 Vandy for two good examples). They were games where in the final 2-3 minutes the opposition fell apart.
The difference wasn't talent - it was preparation, enforcing discipline, and in-game situational coaching. Stallings had all 3, DuBose had zero.
The 2000 season would be an even more disastrous memory if not for what followed when the NCAA used a nuclear warhead to kill a gnat. YES, folks, we WERE guilty of some things - but they basically tried to give the death penalty for jaywalking (and stealing a pocket Casio from the Dollar Tree).
As far as the Shula era.........I'm willing to spot the guy the 2003 season simply because he got a late start with a crippled team and wound up playing both teams that played in the national championship game.
CLOSE GAMES
2003 - 6 (0-6)
2004 - 3 (0-3)
2005 - 4 (3-1)
2006 - 8 (3-5)
CLOSE GAMES RECORD
Stallings 31-10-1
Dubious 8-10
Shula 6-14 (Kines coached the bowl game in 06)
We don't play many close games. What's Saban's record at Alabama in one-score games? 23-15
And remember - SIX of those 15 losses by one score were in 2007........Saban was 4-6 with (basically) Shula's team in one-score games.....oh yeah, and I seem to recall some sort of Textbook scandal ripping some starters away from him as well.
The point? Your good/great coaches have to be able to win close games. At Alabama, we're going to get talent merely because we ARE Alabama.
It's what you do with that talent that matters.