So, maybe we should eliminate Scholarships, better meals than you can get anywhere else, weight/training facilities, textbooks, medical issues, etc. So, I guess we pay them and then $CHARGE$ them for room, board, meals, INSURANCE for medical issues, textbooks, having to take classes with hopefully a major in business/finance so they'll know how to more effectively deal with money they get in the NFL, NBA, MLB, etc. Oh, but less than 5%, I think, of all athletes make it in the PROFESSIONAL leagues.? Hmmmmm.IIRC, Alabama spends and average of over $100k/year for each football player when you include scholarships, room and board, travel, and medical (not counting coaching salaries).
I think there's room for discussion, but if sports generated the profit revenue that many seem to think there'd be no need for the Crimson Standard, etc...
If you pay athletes, you can't discriminate because someone is a female or they don't compete in a 100,000 seat facility. So, equal PAY to PLAY, whether it's softball, baseball, football, basketball, track, rowing, competitive marble playing, lacrosse, golf, competitive spitting athletes (that's to see who can spit the farthest as a team), swimming, etc. That etc. is for any creative sport that I've left out of that list.
So, will each athlete start out receiving $1+ million per year. What if they spend the entire $1 million in one month, a week ... purchase a Mercedes, a home for mom, etc.? Will state legislatures come up with an ATHLETE TAX to gouge people in the top 50% bracket or just the top 1% since ticket sales alone will not do the job? Just thinking out loud ....
I don't think I'd want to be an AD now or in the future.