I think you are mixing posters up because I clearly stated :It seems we have a fundamental disagreement about Clemson’s 2017 campaign. I maintain they did not play for the national championship that year because they didn’t make it to the final game. It seems you disagree and any team that makes the playoffs “played for the championship”. That’s very odd to me.
I don't know where any of that suggests that I think Clemson played for a national championship....But that game isn’t mentioned because it is the least meaningful, and less memorable out of the 4 games. In about 15 years I guarantee you when you ask a non Bama or Clemson fan “ who were the starting quarterbacks in the Sugar Bowl between Bama and Clemson” you will get the same confused look as when folks are asked today “ who was the Oklahoma qb in the 2007 Fiesta Bowl vs Boise”.
Yes the game meant something, but had Alabama lost to UGA it wouldn’t mean more than the winner of the Belk Bowl. More or less people value national championship games higher than the Semis. I mean does anyone really care that the Patriots have been to the last 8 AFCCG and are 5-3 in those, or do they care more that they are 3-1 in SBs in the last 5 years?
But to the quote you quoted :
3 years Clemson:Because it clearly cuts off another national championship they played for. 3 years isn't a number usually used to give a range of things.
2016 National Championship W
2017 Sugar Bowl L
2018 National Championship W
4 Years
2015 National Championship L
2016 National Championship W
2017 Sugar Bowl L
2018 National Championship W
2015 is cut off is my point, not 2017
2017 Sugar Bowl L
2018 National Championship W
2015 is cut off is my point, not 2017
Last edited: