This series is starting to remind me of 2005, when the Astros had Clemens, Roy Oswalt, and Andy Pettit for starters and got swept by the White Sox. I’ll be surprised if the series makes it back to Houston.
The last time a team choked away a 2-0 WS while being on the road for those 2 games....... 1996 yuck.This series is starting to remind me of 2005, when the Astros had Clemens, Roy Oswalt, and Andy Pettit for starters and got swept by the White Sox. I’ll be surprised if the series makes it back to Houston.
I cannot imagine what team that was.The last time a team choked away a 2-0 WS while being on the road for those 2 games....... 1996 yuck.
I cannot imagine what team that was.
Disagree that the Braves were fortunate to win the East even though I agree with the seemingly contradictory assessment that the Nats were a better team. But the Braves played better and beat the Nats H2H early, middle and late in the season. You are right about the poor Wash bp but the Braves' pen was also awful often during the season. They were good down the stretch after the initial hiccups following the 3 acquisitions.Like I said in the other threads, we were very fortunate to win the East. Many of those early Nats-Braves games (pre allstar) that the Braves won mostly boiled down to the Nats having a worse bullpen than the Braves. The Phillies and Mets were the trendy picks in the division before the season, but most people who knew baseball really were picking Braves and Nats.
Agree that the injuries were a killer, especially Freeman. His play at the plate and in the field was awful and killed the Braves at crucial times during the StL series. Sometimes all he needed was just a flyball but whiffed instead.Big was right in that the Braves shut it down too early, but I also think injuries killed us. If we had Culby, Martin, or Ender then we probably win no matter what. But I think no one was beating the Nats in the NLCS.
Could not agree more about the chemistry though IMO, any real roster improvements that present themselves should be taken, though with the chemistry mentioned kept in mind.The one thing that gives me hope watching the Nationals is that their patience and team chemistry is finally paying off. Really the Braves should follow the model, and continue to make Atlanta home for a lot of talent instead of changing it around constantly. Locking down the infield for years to come will go along way in doing that, and getting a Scherzer like #2 man on rotation would also.
Don't know if they let Harper go because of bad locker room influence or because they did not think he was worth the money. I don't know. Never heard of Harper being a cancer but I don't keep up with it that closely, maybe he was.But it is telling that the Nats letting Harper go, and going all in on Sanchez and Corbin has them in their first World Series.
Not sure, but the home team has only won about 51% of MLB playoff games. Home field advantage does not exist in this sport.Have we ever had a World Series where the teams all lost their home games?
I do think it would be more interesting if they did 2-2-1-1-1 rather than 2-3-2 home and awayNot sure, but the home team has only won about 51% of MLB playoff games. Home field advantage does not exist in this sport.
And draw it out even more? Gag.I do think it would be more interesting if they did 2-2-1-1-1 rather than 2-3-2 home and away
Its never happened. The opposite has been true only 3 times.Have we ever had a World Series where the teams all lost their home games?
I think ther have been times where there was some homefield due to the stadium - the Astrodome for instance, when a team was built around the geometry. I remember reading about Jose Lima, who was great his last year in the Dome, walking into Minute Maid muttering "this is no good." And he got shelled there. But the numbers don't lie.Not sure, but the home team has only won about 51% of MLB playoff games. Home field advantage does not exist in this sport.
There are some places that you really dont want a deciding game to be as a visiting team. None of those places are in Houston or DC, but out of the two I would say Houston having homefield advantage gives them a slight edge because of how committed their fans are compared to Washington and how their ballpark is one of those oddities.Not sure, but the home team has only won about 51% of MLB playoff games. Home field advantage does not exist in this sport.
Also Fenway Park. It isn't really an advantage when they play AL teams because those teams are familiar with how to play balls off the wall, but NL teams have had a tough time with that.There are some places that you really dont want a deciding game to be as a visiting team. None of those places are in Houston or DC, but out of the two I would say Houston having homefield advantage gives them a slight edge because of how committed their fans are compared to Washington and how their ballpark is one of those oddities.
I would say the #1 place that I wouldn't want someone to have a homefield advantage in a 7 game series is San Francisco. The wind, location, and crowd noise are huge factors at that place.
That is true, but I think when baseball turned into an analytical sport the Fenway effect lessened due to the emergence of opposite field hitters and leftys.Also Fenway Park. It isn't really an advantage when they play AL teams because those teams are familiar with how to play balls off the wall, but NL teams have had a tough time with that.
The Yankees lineup was designed to take advantage of that short porch in right field for so many years. The new ballpark has no such anomalies.That is true, but I think when baseball turned into an analytical sport the Fenway effect lessened due to the emergence of opposite field hitters and leftys.
I think any ballpark with a sea breeze mixed with a weird structure is a difficult one to adjust to. PNC, Wrigley, and SF come to mind, but I give SF the advantage over the other two because of the team they usually field and the fans.
When the old Yankees stadium first opened right field line was 295. It was “the House Built for Ruth”The Yankees lineup was designed to take advantage of that short porch in right field for so many years. The new ballpark has no such anomalies.
Yep - back in the day it had a monster center field - just huge - but you could check swing a homer down the right field line.When the old Yankees stadium first opened right field line was 295. It was “the House Built for Ruth”