We didn't do either.I was going ballistic when the FG team went out on to the field. I wanted us to go for the TD. FGs were not going to win this game. After Castille made the interception, a TD was a must.
In that situation it is all about heart and pride. Who wants it the most? If we can't score a TD in that situation, we don't deserve to win the game IMHO.
Look... I'm not going to get into a long argument about what he should/should not have done. Even if you believe that we should have gone for it, it DOES matter who takes the lead/momentum into halftime... if you don't agree with that statement, then you've don't understand the dynamics of football. Now, would it have been better to go into halftime with a 7-point lead versus what we had? Yes... I certainly agree with that point. However, if you check our percentages this year on 4th down and consider how our offense was doing yesterday, I imagine that's what Shula was using as a base for his decision.Yes, I understand that we have taken three half-time leads on the road this year and have lost all three in the second half (so much for momentum at the half). It does not matter who leads at half-time, it matters who leads at the end of the game. Take some chances in the 1st half, we had really nothing to lose in that situation.
The way our offense and their defense were playing, I'd say it was highly probable that we wouldn't have gotten the TD. I'm sure Shula was thinking the same thing. And with the 3-3 score so close to halftime, it sure didn't look like it was going to be a high-scoring affair. Just look to last year where neither team scored a TD.I don't see how one can say that going for 3 was right. How many on here thought that Tennessee would not make a touchdown before the end of the day. If we had gone for three and not made it we would have gotten beat 6 points instead of 3. Is it much better to get beat 3 points than it is 6.
I don't see how one can say that going for 3 was right. How many on here thought that Tennessee would not make a touchdown before the end of the day. If we had gone for three and not made it we would have gotten beat 6 points instead of 3. Is it much better to get beat 3 points than it is 6.
How many on here thought Bama would score only 7 points in the 2nd half? How many thought UT would score 13 in the 2nd half?:conf2: