17 points on 3 turnovers. Eliminate those and we win 21-6. Eliminate only 1 of those turnovers, or hit a chip-shot field goal, and we still win. If that was the case, I think the tone of the posts on this board would be very different.
I haven't studied the game as much as some on here. And I haven't re-watched the game. I'm going from one pass, during the heat of the moment. Here's what I don't understand.
It seems like we put together a good drive and score, then stop doing what we just did to put points on the board. When we stick with the short-to-mid range passing game, we're very hard to stop. We have elite receivers who can get open if we get it out quickly. Why are we running slow-developing pass plays that expose the poor blocking of our OL and subject TS to sacks and hurries? Why do we try to force the run game when that's not our strength?
We can blame the OL and our RBs who can't find a hole to hit. We can blame TS for holding onto the ball too long instead of running or throwing it away. But, at some point, you have to ask why the OC is not designing a game plan that maximizes our talent and minimizes our weaknesses. When we do what TS does best, and what our WRs excel at, we're almost unstoppable.
I was a big fan of CRG but I'm starting to sour a bit. I think he tries to be too cute at times. Just figure out what works and do it. Over...and over...again...until they stop it.