I confess that I have not been following the legal aspects of NIL, just the associated fallout in recruiting. I am not a lawyer, but I know a couple of them.
Would it not be possible for the NCAA to say that in order to participate in our sanctioned sports activities, you have to be an amateur athlete, as defined by the NCAA. Getting paid to advertise for Joe’s Plumbing? Sorry, we no longer consider you an amateur athlete. These athletes are only providing value to these booster/collectives if they are participating in NCAA sanctioned events.
Am I missing something here? How the NCAA defines who may participate in their sanctioned sports seems like a way to handle this. Just like they suspend or expel those who fail drug tests. Or are associated with gambling.
Sorry, I am probably missing some of the legal findings that invalidate my supposition. And I did not sleep at a Holiday Inn Express or have my morning coffee!
It is also possible that I am incredibly naïve!