Hopefully the BOT will not approve a renovation to get a smaller arena! This is just plain BS. I can’t see any logic in this. We need a NEW arena with a minimum of 12k seats. You obviously don’t have much confidence in Coach Oats and the program’s future. Never compare us to Auburn or Ole Miss. Many contributing alums like myself do not support Byrne’s intimate plans for UA basketball!
I agree we need a new arena. But seating should be in the 9-10K range. We get more than that for only Kentucky, Auburn, and occasionally LSU. Other than those three games, a bigger arena is wasted.
A smaller arena, more packed out, strikes me as selling recruits and ticket buyers far better than a larger arena with more vacant seats.
I am neither an engineer nor construction estimator. So I have no educated idea on costs. But in a conversation with a Development Officer about 5 years ago, I asked the difference in cost of renovation of Coleman vs. demo and build new. At that time, the difference was about $50 million. So the higher number today doesn’t surprise me.
Still, this will be at least the third ”renovation” of Coleman. To my untrained eye, it strikes me as lipstick on an outdated pig.
I can‘t help but believe that $190 million for what you really need is better in the long run than $115 million for an overhaul of a 50-year-old facility.
Put another way, two previous renovations acknowledged, Coleman is 50 years old. Whereas Foster Auditorium, built in 1939, was 30 years old when it was replaced by what is today known as Coleman (at the time, Memorial Coliseum).
I fear we will spend $115 million, and still have what is at heart a 50-year-old arena.
It strikes me as parallel to spending $20K to rebuild the engine and transmission, plus put a godamighty paint job, on a 2010 Chevy Impala. When you’re done, $20K later, you still have a 2010 Chevy Impala. Whereas you could have spent $30k on a new one.