News Article: Interesting take on Trump from the NYT...

BamaInBham

All-American
Feb 14, 2007
4,692
2,554
187
I agree with the remarks above that too far right or too far left will not get you elected. The vast majority of the voting populace is squarely in the middle. If that weren't so, then the presidential elections, even with the strangeness of the electoral college, would not swing back and forth the way it does. I must say that this is the weirdest primary season I've ever seen, and I've been alive and aware a long time...
I wonder if there are any studies on this. My instinct, which may very well be wrong, would be that usually 80%-85% of those who vote are settled before anyone even announces, and the fight is over the 15%-20%. In fact, the fight is over an even smaller slice, since it is only the undecideds in undecided, i.e., battleground, states.

Of course, there may be exceptions if either candidate is particularly good or bad. Or even a climate like now where so many on the Right hate their own party enough that if they make the wrong move, it is conceivable that many could sit this one out or vote 3rd party in defiance. Like you said in another post in this thread, this is a strange season.
 

Jon

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2002
16,447
15,056
282
Atlanta 'Burbs
I wonder if there are any studies on this. My instinct, which may very well be wrong, would be that usually 80%-85% of those who vote are settled before anyone even announces, and the fight is over the 15%-20%. In fact, the fight is over an even smaller slice, since it is only the undecideds in undecided, i.e., battleground, states.

Of course, there may be exceptions if either candidate is particularly good or bad. Or even a climate like now where so many on the Right hate their own party enough that if they make the wrong move, it is conceivable that many could sit this one out or vote 3rd party in defiance. Like you said in another post in this thread, this is a strange season.
both major parties have been screwing over their constituents for so long that both the leading candidates are wholly unwanted by the party itself, it is fascinating to watch
 

TIDE-HSV

Senior Administrator
Staff member
Oct 13, 1999
86,555
44,729
437
Huntsville, AL,USA
What did he say ?
Jon posted the link below, but a script on the link freezes my computer. I'm pretty sure he said that being gay was a choice or, otherwise, so many men wouldn't enter prison hetero and come out gay. Some choice. And the studies which have been done indicate the vast majority of men leaving prison revert to their normal preferences, although there may be a small percentage who may discover gay preferences or, at least, they're more open to the gay side. However, no matter how much I may regard neurosurgeons as glorified mechanics (I've actually personally known a few), I don't want one operating on me who believes gay sex in prison is a choice or that the world is 6,000 years old. That's scary...
 

Jon

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2002
16,447
15,056
282
Atlanta 'Burbs
He does not take the Biblical view. I won't hijack the thread by stating it here, but it is not his or yours or T-H's.
Maybe not your definition of the Biblical view but it meets my definition of it.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczy...y-tale-theory-of-evolution-encoura#.xtZpJJMM0

In a speech delivered in 2012, Ben Carson said the big bang theory was part of the “fairy tales” pushed by “highfalutin scientists” as a story of creation.
Similarly, Carson, a noted creationist, said he believed the theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct.”
 
Last edited:

81usaf92

TideFans Legend
Apr 26, 2008
36,912
36,283
187
South Alabama
Maybe not your definition of the Biblical view but it meets my definition of it.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczy...y-tale-theory-of-evolution-encoura#.xtZpJJMM0
To be fair, both the creationism standpoint and the Big Bang theory can neither be confirmed or denied by science since neither meets the laws of known chemistry and physics. So both are unproven so to accept one means you almost are denying the other. Just because you don't agree with what he says that neither means he is out of line or wrong in what he says.
 

BamaInBham

All-American
Feb 14, 2007
4,692
2,554
187
Maybe not your definition of the Biblical view but it meets my definition of it.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczy...y-tale-theory-of-evolution-encoura#.xtZpJJMM0
I have not been very clear. I meant that he did not express the Biblical view of homosexuality, not creation. He backed off of his assertion that homosexuality is a choice. The Bible clearly states in both the OT and NT that it is a sin.

As best I can tell he does hold the Biblical view of creation. Though I would not state it the way in which he did, I do agree with the essence of what I interpret him to be saying: "For in six days God created the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them..."

You are not wanting to go down this road in this thread are you ? Can you just start one or two more threads ?
 

OreBama

All-American
Sep 26, 2005
3,349
5
57
Portland, OR
Just to jump in, I think Trump is the person that America deserves. Not necessarily the man America needs. If you don't get that right away, think on it.
 

Jon

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2002
16,447
15,056
282
Atlanta 'Burbs
I have not been very clear. I meant that he did not express the Biblical view of homosexuality, not creation. He backed off of his assertion that homosexuality is a choice. The Bible clearly states in both the OT and NT that it is a sin.

As best I can tell he does hold the Biblical view of creation. Though I would not state it the way in which he did, I do agree with the essence of what I interpret him to be saying: "For in six days God created the heavens and the earth, the sea and all that is in them..."

You are not wanting to go down this road in this thread are you ? Can you just start one or two more threads ?
sorry about that, my issue with Carson is mainly the 6000 year old earth that doesn't square with either reality or his education level. His gay comments didn't really surprise me as they are exactly what I would expect of a deluded fundy nut-bag, and I'd be happy to continue this in another thread if you want to, if not I'll stop here
 

selmaborntidefan

TideFans Legend
Mar 31, 2000
39,109
34,634
287
55
I have not been very clear. I meant that he did not express the Biblical view of homosexuality, not creation. He backed off of his assertion that homosexuality is a choice. The Bible clearly states in both the OT and NT that it is a sin.
I don't generally comment upon gay rights threads other than in a very general way because, well, just like abortion no discussion ever really changes minds. I concur with you that the Scriptures CLEARLY and indisputably teach homosexuality as a sin, and I've said so here, and I've also dismissed those who try convoluted arguments to say 'well it really means' something else. (Keep in mind also that Jon is an atheist and rejects that worldview and many others - just information, not a criticism).

But now let's jump out of the frying pan and into the fire (pardon the pun).

Why do so many Christians who say that homosexuality is a sin ASSUME that this makes it a choice? Why the assumption that God would not make somebody that way? (Yes, I just opened up a Pandora's box, but I try - I REALLY do - I try to consider whether a critic of my view has something to what he or she says. I can completely understand why a person rejects the authority of the Bible or that homosexuality is a sin or even that God doesn't exist. I don't agree, but I actually understand them to varying degrees).

But I don't understand why so many Christians, evangelicals like myself, make the assumption that if there is a God and He has declared it a sin, why assume He did not make them that way? Didn't He make other sinners inclined to OTHER sins as well? Or is the problem that drunks can already marry fornicators and our other cherished sins?

Don't take my question as a criticism of you, but I actually can understand Carson believing it is NOT a choice but IS a sin. I reject a 6,000-year old earth because even if one assumes a biblical worldview, not only is it based upon erroneous assumptions but also Christians for hundreds of years believed the earth was older than 6,000 years even long before Darwin. They at least had an Earth (in some cases) of over 200,000 years old based upon what little they knew before the Enlightenment.

(I'll simply say it here and not direct it at you, but I've never appreciated people who want to insist that Jesus was under some sort of mandate to explain that just because 'in the beginning God made Adam and Eve,' that somehow cannot be true of an old earth. I resent it because the people judging me cannot even read the original language but have come to some pretty dogmatic conclusions based upon that ignorance. I can painstakingly work my way through Hebrew, and there is no 'magic code,' okay? I also don't believe in bonding my religion to my science because the moment science changes, the religion is no longer a timeless truth).

For the record, Jimmy Carter wrote a letter during the 1976 campaign to the Atlanta Constipation (heh heh) saying:

"The article in Monday's Atlanta Constitution incorrectly states that I do not believe in such biblical accounts as Eve being created fro Adam's rib and other such miracles. I have never made any such statement and have no reason to disbelieve Genesis 2:21, 22 or other biblical miracles." (see T.H. White, "America In Search of Itself," 199, n. 1). And Reagan even proposed Creationism be taught in the public schools fwiw.
 

BamaInBham

All-American
Feb 14, 2007
4,692
2,554
187
sorry about that, my issue with Carson is mainly the 6000 year old earth that doesn't square with either reality or his education level. His gay comments didn't really surprise me as they are exactly what I would expect of a deluded fundy nut-bag, and I'd be happy to continue this in another thread if you want to, if not I'll stop here
Starting another thread is up to you. I'm not sure what would be accomplished since we have both been through the creation and homosexuality board wars. I guess the only difference would be the introduction of politics into the mix. It is your call. I may or may not participate.
 

BamaInBham

All-American
Feb 14, 2007
4,692
2,554
187
I don't generally comment upon gay rights threads other than in a very general way because, well, just like abortion no discussion ever really changes minds. I concur with you that the Scriptures CLEARLY and indisputably teach homosexuality as a sin, and I've said so here, and I've also dismissed those who try convoluted arguments to say 'well it really means' something else. (Keep in mind also that Jon is an atheist and rejects that worldview and many others - just information, not a criticism).

But now let's jump out of the frying pan and into the fire (pardon the pun).

Why do so many Christians who say that homosexuality is a sin ASSUME that this makes it a choice? Why the assumption that God would not make somebody that way? (Yes, I just opened up a Pandora's box, but I try - I REALLY do - I try to consider whether a critic of my view has something to what he or she says. I can completely understand why a person rejects the authority of the Bible or that homosexuality is a sin or even that God doesn't exist. I don't agree, but I actually understand them to varying degrees).

But I don't understand why so many Christians, evangelicals like myself, make the assumption that if there is a God and He has declared it a sin, why assume He did not make them that way? Didn't He make other sinners inclined to OTHER sins as well? Or is the problem that drunks can already marry fornicators and our other cherished sins?

Don't take my question as a criticism of you, but I actually can understand Carson believing it is NOT a choice but IS a sin. I reject a 6,000-year old earth because even if one assumes a biblical worldview, not only is it based upon erroneous assumptions but also Christians for hundreds of years believed the earth was older than 6,000 years even long before Darwin. They at least had an Earth (in some cases) of over 200,000 years old based upon what little they knew before
I will try to answer the "homosexuality is a choice issue" now. I will try to get to the others tomorrow.

I can understand and sympathize with anyone's lack of clarity regarding this issue, especially since there is no direct statement about this, i.e., it must be inferred. But we both know that a choice is made. Even a heterosexual chooses to have sex when he does, whether it is legitimate, that is in the bonds of marriage, or illegitimate.

That any sin is a choice is supported by the process of temptation turning into sin. "But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own desire. Then when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin..."

Anyone who reads Rom 1 must conclude that a choice is made. V24 "therefore God gave them over in the desires of their heart to impurity, that their bodies might be dishonored among them. " v 26 "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of a woman and burned in their desire towards one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. And just as they did not see fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, ...greed,...envy,...deceit, ...arrogant, ...unloving..."

Also, God would never make someone to sin, He "...is too pure to behold evil". "Let no one say when he is tempted, 'I am tempted by God', for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt any one" OTOH, He obviously allows sin.

There are other approaches to demonstrate that man always chooses to sin and that the Lord would never have anything to do with it.

Let me add that homosexuals are created in the image of God and are to be accorded the respect due such a creature. Nevertheless, sexual perversion is a sin, as is selfishness, pride, adultery, resentment, being unforgiving, unkindness, etc. More importantly, the same salvation: by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, is needed by all and available to all, including homosexuals. There have been sodomites saved and delivered from their sin.

Myself, I became an atheist at age 12, was convicted of possession of LSD at age 21, and guilty of much more, then saved by the grace of Jesus Christ at age 24 in 1974. I should say nothing from a perspective of self-righteousness.
 

OreBama

All-American
Sep 26, 2005
3,349
5
57
Portland, OR
I thought this thread was about Trump. The last couple of pages are all about Ben Carson, creationism, and homosexuality. I can't keep up. Unless... Trump is a homosexual creationist who lust for Ben Carson. That's interesting, I'm back on board. Sorry to hijack the thread.
 

TideFans.shop - Get your Gear HERE!

Reyn Spooner Scenic Bama Shirt
Alabama Crimson Tide Reyn Spooner Scenic Polo - Crimson

Get this and many more items at our TideFans.shop!

Purchases may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads