Now they'll go back to "$100 handshakes." Curiouser and curiouser!Exactly- easy to say, not so easy to audit or enforce.
Now they'll go back to "$100 handshakes." Curiouser and curiouser!Exactly- easy to say, not so easy to audit or enforce.
I'm sure our courts and politicians would declare that they all have the right.So when will the first big budget CFB team all identify as female?
No one would ever want to face that Crimson Tide
You are trying to apply logic to politicians or bureaucrats.Women's sports for the most part aren't televised. Where does the "equal" NIL value come from...?![]()
That's a problem for WOKE.What's going to end up happening is Title IX is going to force so many rules this will end up back at where they were, getting not much of anything. The courts WILL NOT budge in protecting Title IX even to the point of ridiculous. They won't care about the independence of transactions, and will ultimately end up violating the male players' rights to earn money to preserve Title IX. Just watch, this will collapse on itself.
Please keep your political views out of this or it will get shut down.That's a problem for WOKE.
Livvy Dunne the LSU gymnast is a prime example...and less so the Cavender twins...but they have some market value for NIL, so they got NIL...an obscure women's tennis player no one knows does not...so if we are to maintain NIL is for College athletes to get paid for their market value then Title IX does not apply. But if we are going to acknowledge that NIL is just pay for play then Title IX does apply....yet another fail by the NCAAIt is the ages old argument of opportunity versus outcomes. Title IX SHOULD be concerned only with equal opportunity for women in athletics. Not equal outcomes in terms of NIL. Someone’s Name, Image, and likeness value is based on marketability and appeal. As long as universities are giving women the opportunity to create that NIL value through their performance, then that is all they can and should do.
And while the appeal of women’s intercollegiate sports is growing, particularly softball and basketball, it still pales in comparison to the appeal of men’s sports. And NIL revenue distribution/opportunity shouid be reflective of that.
And in the case of Livvy Dunne, much of that NIL valve was created outside of LSU gymnastics, not necessarily BECAUSE of it. She has 8 million followers because of her appeal across genres and audiences.Livvy Dunne the LSU gymnast is a prime example...and less so the Cavender twins...but they have some market value for NIL, so they got NIL...an obscure women's tennis player no one knows does not...so if we are to maintain NIL is for College athletes to get paid for their market value then Title IX does not apply. But if we are going to acknowledge that NIL is just pay for play then Title IX does apply....yet another fail by the NCAA
She isn't even the best gymnast on her own team. She is hawt. That is it. That is the way it is for women in sports. The hottest will make the most. Is it fair? Nope. but that is the truth.And in the case of Livvy Dunne, much of that NIL valve was created outside of LSU gymnastics, not necessarily BECAUSE of it. She has 8 million followers because of her appeal across genres and audiences.
The French pole vaulter says hello.She isn't even the best gymnast on her own team. She is hawt. That is it. That is the way it is for women in sports. The hottest will make the most. Is it fair? Nope. but that is the truth.