Bama Game Thread: Official Postgame Thread - Bama vs. USF...

Status
Not open for further replies.

tusks_n_raider

Hall of Fame
May 13, 2009
13,922
16,422
187
Mobile, AL
IMO, it's has to be #2. We have seen what Ty can do. Let's just pretend like Milroe doesn't exist for a moment. Does anyone here seriously think Ty can't be as good as Coker or McCarron? That's all we need.
I think he could be better than both but I understand your point.

We'd probably be unstoppable with Carson Beck or Stetson Bennett

I watched highlights of all the games with Top 25 teams yesterday and was green with envy at other teams with QB's that went through progressions and threw WR's open and distributed the ball to their playmakers at different levels of the field.
 

colbysullivan

Hall of Fame
Dec 12, 2007
18,651
18,511
187
Gulf Breeze, FL
I think he could be better than both but I understand your point.

We'd probably be unstoppable with Carson Beck or Stetson Bennett

I watched highlights of all the games with Top 25 teams yesterday and was green with envy at other teams with QB's that went through progressions and threw WR's open and distributed the ball to their playmakers at different levels of the field.
He absolutely could, but we aren't allowed to say that.
 
  • Thank You
  • Like
Reactions: Toddrn and Superdad

RollTide_HTTR

Hall of Fame
Feb 22, 2017
9,691
8,095
187
Yes, it was a silly play call. It's also silly to think a starting D1 college QB can't handle a snap under center...
Like I said originally, Milroe should have been able to handle the snap.

But its more common to have snap issues under center than in shotgun especially for college QBs and especially if you rarely work under center. So the playcall was more frustrating to me in this case than the mistake by Milroe.
 

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
32,323
24,696
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
I think he could be better than both but I understand your point.

We'd probably be unstoppable with Carson Beck or Stetson Bennett

I watched highlights of all the games with Top 25 teams yesterday and was green with envy at other teams with QB's that went through progressions and threw WR's open and distributed the ball to their playmakers at different levels of the field.
That and I was green with envy of the top 25 teams whose OL didn't look like a swinging door.
 

colbysullivan

Hall of Fame
Dec 12, 2007
18,651
18,511
187
Gulf Breeze, FL
Like I said originally, Milroe should have been able to handle the snap.

But its more common to have snap issues under center than in shotgun especially for college QBs and especially if you rarely work under center. So the playcall was more frustrating to me in this case than the mistake by Milroe.
I agree. I said it was Sheridan's fault earlier. I hate the idea of being in shotgun from the 1 yard line, but it seems like QBs just don't know how to be under center anymore, so you might as well play to their strengths.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RollTide_HTTR

denver

All-American
Nov 11, 2017
2,763
2,839
187
if he was anywhere as good as AJ, he’d be starting.
Todays CFB dynamics are different....there are 'team" dynamics that seem to be affecting the QB decision...we saw it last year, Saban eluded to it....maybe its NIL, portal threat or something else...but its beyond a simple decision to replace a starting QB now
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbysullivan

Bamabuzzard

FB Moderator
Staff member
Aug 15, 2004
32,323
24,696
337
49
Where ever there's BBQ, Bourbon & Football
Todays CFB dynamics are different....there are 'team" dynamics that seem to be affecting the QB decision...we saw it last year, Saban eluded to it....maybe its NIL, portal threat or something else...but its beyond a simple decision to replace a starting QB now
Just speaking in general, the portal, IMO, has changed the landscape of college football more than anything. If a QB isn't playing and he thinks he should, he's gone at the next portal opening. If a WR isn't getting the touches or snaps he thinks he should, he's gone at the next portal opening (Bond is our example). Players have more leverage now than they ever have and that is both a good thing and a bad thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocky Mtn Bob

BamaMoon

Hall of Fame
Apr 1, 2004
22,073
19,020
282
Boone, NC
Todays CFB dynamics are different....there are 'team" dynamics that seem to be affecting the QB decision...we saw it last year, Saban eluded to it....maybe its NIL, portal threat or something else...but its beyond a simple decision to replace a starting QB now
Yeah, we've made our bed. Now we've got to sleep in it.

If a change is warranted I hope it happens, but I'm not holding my breath.
 

mlh

All-American
Apr 28, 2004
3,396
2,081
282
Just speaking in general, the portal, IMO, has changed the landscape of college football more than anything. If a QB isn't playing and he thinks he should, he's gone at the next portal opening. If a WR isn't getting the touches or snaps he thinks he should, he's gone at the next portal opening (Bond is our example). Players have more leverage now than they ever have and that is both a good thing and a bad thing.
Speaking of portal...

Pitt beat Cincinnati 28-27

Eli Holstein - 20 of 35, 302 yards, 3 TDs, 1 Int
 

bamaslammer

All-American
Jan 8, 2003
4,531
1,266
282
Argo, AL, St Clair
www.kirkwoodhouse.com
I would love to have a chat with #56 and ask him, (calmly so he does not get defensive), "Who did you think was going to block the defensive tackle lined up on your left shoulder? Immediately after the snap, you were looking in at the Nose lined up on the center. Who was going to black the defensive tackle?"
If the blocking scheme was drawn up in such a way that the LG doubled the nose and left an unblocked DT for the running back to pick up, then we have a scheme problem.
You are correct that there really is no excuse. There is no situation in any offense where a DL is let go for a running back to take. Let's just think about the physics here. A DL weighs from around 275 to 320. A running back weighs usually around 210. If your offense is calling on a RB to stop someone who outweighs them by 65 to 100 lbs you're going to get two results. One is a big fat "L", the other is a RB in the ER, make that three because hit's mom's going to shank you with a fountain pen from her purse when she finds you. Knowing that DeBoer isn't' stupid, and working from the inside out which every protection does, there is no way he should not have taken that guy, EVER. Even screens don't allow the inside guys immediate access.
 

Tidewater

FB|NS|NSNP Moderator
Staff member
Mar 15, 2003
23,384
15,822
337
Hooterville, Vir.
I though it may be a rolling pocket, but if thats the case , 56 has to at least chip the DT, you cant expect a 215lb RB to block a 290 lb DT , and he didnt, he slowed him . 52 was completely beat by the speed rush and the linebacker behind the crashing DT came as well. There was a play to be made , off screen top right a receiver was running an out and the DB was playing soft . Im thinking the inside slant was not there because the mid level backer in the throwing lane.

All that said, before the play, i saw no oline communication. Maybe it was a stunt rolling pocket so they didnt want to tip it off. I think the biggest issue was players not used to olaying in those positions.
The irony was that #56 ends up blocking no one while the RB ends up being folded like a pocket knife.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TideFans.shop - Black Friday: up to 30% off!

TideFansShop.com : up to 30% Off Sitewide!

Purchases made through our TideFans.shop and Amazon.com links may result in a commission being paid to TideFans.

Latest threads