Yup, I agree.
We will most likely be in nickel or dime most of the game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We will most likely be in nickel or dime most of the game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Me thinks this may have a lot to do with the low betting line coming out of the desert as well ... hoping this is not the case tho.
Does anyone see or defense playing with one less LB and adding a Perry or Williams to lessen the mismatch between our everyday LBs and UofM TE Engram? More of a 4-2-5 set.
Since they are not so much a power running team so they aren't likely pound us with one less large body in our defense.
I doubt it. if we do that, Ole Miss will smell that coming miles away.
We will most likely be in nickel or dime most of the game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what Bama579 was saying..Yup, I agree.
Yup, I agree.
I wonder how our DL matches up with their OL. Plus they have that 300 lbs running back too.
After taking a little closer look at OM's #1 ranked passing defense, they have played 3 of the absolute worst passing offenses in the country. Boise St is respectable at 31st, but Memphis is ranked 85th, ULL is 93rd, and Vandy is 115th.
Our passing defense is ranked 20th, but we faced West Virginia at #3, UF at #49, USM at #67, and FAU at #105.
Incidentally, OM's defense allowed more yards (399) to Boise's 38th ranked offense than we did to WVU's #11 (393 yards) ranked offense. WVU's offense is averaging 551 YPC, and we limited them to less than 400 yards.
I believe their defense is good, but I'm not sure if they are juggernaut people are making them out to be.
I just can't wait to LOL when we put 500+ yds of offense on them and everyone wants to suddenly backtrack on how good their defense was.
Then why say we wouldn't when Bama579 suggested it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just can't wait to LOL when we put 500+ yds of offense on them and everyone wants to suddenly backtrack on how good their defense was.
I`m just a natural born worrier and I guess all we can do is take CNS at his word, but I`m concerned that Blake may not be 100% by Saturday. Just a feeling.
I just can't wait to LOL when we put 500+ yds of offense on them and everyone wants to suddenly backtrack on how good their defense was.
Are you equally as concerned that the coaches haven't been working with Jake Coker?
Personally, I'm hoping Blake is up to playing. However I also know for a fact that CNS isn't going to jeopardize the game by putting the entire game plan on the hopes that he is. If Blake is up to playing, great. If he's not, I'm sure Jake will be ready to take the reigns.
Are you equally as concerned that the coaches haven't been working with Jake Coker?
Personally, I'm hoping Blake is up to playing. However I also know for a fact that CNS isn't going to jeopardize the game by putting the entire game plan on the hopes that he is. If Blake is up to playing, great. If he's not, I'm sure Jake will be ready to take the reigns.
It bothered me just a bit when CNS compared Blake's situation to AJ's. AJ's was much worse than generally known. I kept hearing that and then he just quit throwing downfield at all...I`m just a natural born worrier and I guess all we can do is take CNS at his word, but I`m concerned that Blake may not be 100% by Saturday. Just a feeling.
It bothered me just a bit when CNS compared Blake's situation to AJ's. AJ's was much worse than generally known. I kept hearing that and then he just quit throwing downfield at all...