Texas said "We want in at 50%". SEC "5.88%". Texas ok 40%. SEC "5.88". Texas "Well we'll take 30%". SEC "5.88". Texas "give OU 5.88% and we'll come in at 20". SEC "5.88". Texas "we'll drop the Longhorn Network and take 10%". SEC "5.88 just like everyone else". Texas "Just like Alabama"? SEC "yep". Texas with hat in hands "ok then".You keep hearing about the proposal made to TX and OU and how attractive it was.
It literally could have been written on a napkin. 1 share = 1 vote = $80mm + 1/16 of other conference revenue. If anything else was promised to them and not other members this deal would not have got done. We like also said the SEC will not fund any early buyouts either but they join as early as 2022.
They are about to learn that Vandy has as much say as they do...
If Clemson joins all they'd need then is Ohio State to join and suddenly the SEC would have all the legitimate national championship contenders, so there would really be no need for a playoff. Just name the SEC champion the National Champion and be done with it.Per Marc Ryan (PFF College) - Clemson and FSU have reached out to the SEC to inquire joining.
In the same thread, the guy says the SEC is concerned the streaming numbers from Clemson/FSU would not move the needle enough to justify. Says Notre Dame is the only worthwhile candidate left out there.Per Marc Ryan (PFF College) - Clemson and FSU have reached out to the SEC to inquire joining.
That’s kinda how it’s been anyway.If Clemson joins all they'd need then is Ohio State to join and suddenly the SEC would have all the legitimate national championship contenders, so there would really be no need for a playoff. Just name the SEC champion the National Champion and be done with it.
This has been a sore spot with me from day one. Conversation I had (gist of it) with a FSU bozo (okay, he was actually a good friend) in the fall of 1992:I would tell FSU they should have joined 30 years ago instead of the ACC.
But I think this will be about the monopoly power, not about TV, too.In the same thread, the guy says the SEC is concerned the streaming numbers from Clemson/FSU would not move the needle enough to justify. Says Notre Dame is the only worthwhile candidate left out there.
They would absolutely move the needle though.In the same thread, the guy says the SEC is concerned the streaming numbers from Clemson/FSU would not move the needle enough to justify. Says Notre Dame is the only worthwhile candidate left out there.
The problem is Ohio State isn't likely to join. The Pac-12 and the Big 10 are likely to cooperate more and I would only assume in the long run Notre Dame would choose their rivals in those conferences. So Southern Cal, Notre Dame, Ohio State, etc... they're still going to be bluebloods and their conferences will have around 50% of the say even if the SEC takes the ACC football powers (in a bizarre no new territory expansion).If Clemson joins all they'd need then is Ohio State to join and suddenly the SEC would have all the legitimate national championship contenders, so there would really be no need for a playoff. Just name the SEC champion the National Champion and be done with it.
It’s a nice idea but for some reason the OSU admin is sticking with the hopelessly awful and awfully inept Big Ten administration.If Clemson joins all they'd need then is Ohio State to join
That's just too weird for me. Notre Dame too. I know we're going for world domination here, but I'd prefer the Big Ten stay the Big Ten and the SEC the SEC. Even if the number hasn't been right in years and we've long since left the southeastern borders behind.It’s a nice idea but for some reason the OSU admin is sticking with the hopelessly awful and awfully inept Big Ten administration.