So Tampa Bay wanted to prevent Mahomes from scrambling and they wanted to pressure him too; Thought their DL played great (Also thought the 2 deep zone defense was brilliant). So does this mean when Alabama plays a running / scrambling QB and the “mush rush” talk begins, that containing a QB doesn’t necessarily mean equal pressure up the field? The Tampa Bay defensive line was attacking Mahomes, and I think it got to Mahomes and changed the way he played most of the season. Sacks may not be a critical statistic but I believe slobber-knocking a QB certainly does appear to be one.
There's a lot to unpack in what Tampa did.
Schematically, they played in a 2-4 for most of the night. This is something that Bama has also started doing, but we still use our 3-3 look more often than not. That said, one of tampa's OLBs weights 275, so he's not much smaller than some of our DEs, but he gives them a lot of scheme versatility. The other OLB is right at 250. Our OLBs typically are in the 250 range, with a few a bit bigger, but this year we were pretty small with Allen at 250 and Anderson only around 235. Due to that, we have to play more 3-3 to help against the run and really only used the 2-4 in pass heavy downs. it also helps that White is really fast, so he can close down the QB effectively from his ILB spot
Stylistically, you hit two things. Mush rush and zone. Bama typically uses the mush rush because we play a lot of man coverage, so the LBs and short route DBs are not able to help contain the QB on a scramble. By playing more zone, Tampa is able to have the LBs and DBs help if a mobile QB breaks out. Bama has been zone averse for a while, but Saban has been pushing the DCs to call a more varied combination of zone v man coverages so that we can let the rush go full bore more often.