The Republican Vote Suppression Machine Is Out of Control

[NationalTitles18]

Marc Elias (@marcelias.bsky.social)

What a strange headline for a story that notes: 1. 2,169 ballots were rejected for no ID. 2. "The voter ID law disproportionately hindered Democrats." 3. "The evidence overwhelmingly shows" that fraud "is essentially nonexistent." 4. The state Supreme Court race was decided by only 625 votes.

bsky.app

What a strange headline for a story that notes:

1. 2,169 ballots were rejected for no ID.
2. "The voter ID law disproportionately hindered Democrats."
3. "The evidence overwhelmingly shows" that fraud "is essentially nonexistent."
4. The state Supreme Court race was decided by only 625 votes.

 

[CrimsonJazz]

MSN

www.msn.com

Kamala Harris won the U.S elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024

Turn the channel, I've already seen this show. The ending never changes.

Kamala Harris won the U.S. elections: Bombshell report claims voting machines were tampered with before 2024: A new report is stirring fresh debate about the outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, claiming that voting machines were secretly altered before ballots were even cast. The bombshell allegation raises a serious question: Did Kamala Harris actually win the 2024 election?

LOL, no.

Were votes miscounted or ignored in key counties?

Well now, that's a good question. People have been asking this for years now. Sounds like a pretty groovy argument for Voter ID and paper ballots. And yeah, Harris was gonna take NY anyway, so why does it matter? For third-party voters and non-voters who no longer have faith in the system, it matters. It matters a great deal.

While the lawsuit won’t change the outcome of the election—Congress already certified Trump’s victory—it could set off wider probes, from state investigations to federal criminal inquiries.

Sure, it could, but likely will not. At least not in a way that will change anything.

 

[CrimsonJazz]

Douglass Mackey's Vote-by-Text Meme Conviction Reversed, Citing Insufficient Evidence of Conspiracy

A short excerpt from today's long decision in U.S. v. Mackey by Second Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston, joined by…

reason.com

 

[Tidewater]

MSN

www.msn.com

Turn the channel, I've already seen this show. The ending never changes.



LOL, no.



Well now, that's a good question. People have been asking this for years now. Sounds like a pretty groovy argument for Voter ID and paper ballots. And yeah, Harris was gonna take NY anyway, so why does it matter? For third-party voters and non-voters who no longer have faith in the system, it matters. It matters a great deal.

Sure, it could, but likely will not. At least not in a way that will change anything.

Extra credit for using the word "groovy" in a non-ironic sense.

 

[CrimsonJazz]

Extra credit for using the word "groovy" in a non-ironic sense.

Believe it or not, I started that about 35 years ago and here I am still using it. It was good for getting some pretty strange looks from people, especially Boomers who either frowned or smiled when hearing that word.